Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-30-2004, 03:44 AM
sYc sYc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 8,578
Thanks: 3
Thanked 404 Times in 91 Posts
Default Re: 1967 Baldwin Motion Camaro.

Hey, if you have it figured out, would you mind explaining it to me?
__________________
Tom Clary
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-30-2004, 03:47 AM
Belair62 Belair62 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 13,448
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Default Re: 1967 Baldwin Motion Camaro.

If I had a BM Camaro I would sue Joel too to make sure no one would think it's real ..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-30-2004, 03:50 AM
sYc sYc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 8,578
Thanks: 3
Thanked 404 Times in 91 Posts
Default Re: 1967 Baldwin Motion Camaro.

NOW I get it. Sure wish Don was still around so I could get him to say my cars were not Yenkos.
__________________
Tom Clary
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-30-2004, 09:37 AM
MotownMadman MotownMadman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,380
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: 1967 Baldwin Motion Camaro.

This is absolutly ridiculous! This whole conspiracy theory just dont fit! Even with my sometines warped and twisted perception of things I cant find a spot outside the box to stand! The whole concept is based upon the idea of one of the original owners wanting it back........so bad he is going to threaten to sue the only man on the frigging planet who can turn a $15,000 driver Camaro into a BM car, so two things come to mind, nobody who can think outside a straight jacket would threaten to hammer the goose if it lays the golden egg, and even more absurd is the fact that if the previous owner knows the car is a BM and wants it back, now that it has a shadow hanging over it why not just BUY IT BACK! 250,000 people who attended Barrett Jackson could have bought that car, probebly for less then the asking price of $69,995, which if it is the Baldwin Motion this owner claims it to be, he could buy it for about half of WHAT IT'S WORTH! So, concoct a story like this to buy back a car that cant be documented because you threatened the source of documentation which means it will never see full value......when all you had to do is BUY IT BACK! Who the hell is the former owner, Tuttle? These guys are smoking better weed then I have ever seen, maybe the only reason I can see through this BS is because I didnt Inhale! The whole thing is ridiculous, this last week has been like going to the Comedy Den, first you got a guy trying to claim a car as being stolen from him and he wants it back, at the same time all the previous owners to the car are scrathing their heads and wondering why if this idiot wanted to go to prison so bad why not throw a brick through a post office window, at the same time another fool is convincing the world his old car is a fake to make it worthless all the while it's FOR SALE and he could have it at a moments notice to spend the next five years trying to convince the world it's real! Were these two guys related? Somebody get me a bottle of Crown Royal quick, I need some clarity in my life!
MomanMadtown
__________________
"What Kind Of Bird Dont Fly?......."
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-30-2004, 12:14 PM
JoeC JoeC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: ri
Posts: 3,736
Thanks: 447
Thanked 2,455 Times in 625 Posts
Default Re: 1967 Baldwin Motion Camaro.

[ QUOTE ]
This whole conspiracy theory just dont fit!

[/ QUOTE ]
That's it!
The car was bought by the man on the grassy knoll
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-30-2004, 12:24 PM
70 copo 70 copo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: chillicothe Ohio 45601
Posts: 3,834
Thanks: 219
Thanked 1,241 Times in 578 Posts
Default Re: 1967 Baldwin Motion Camaro.

Mowtown,
I looked this car over too:

SS-427's on the hood too late for a this car (68-up)

Motion Plaques on fenders, spoiler, and valve covers- again too Late for a this car (69-up)

Hood was reproduction. and was cut out in the center. Chop Gun work on what was left was really smooth also.

Heads were polished.

Valve covers were the finned type with the rectangular centers for the plaques- again too late for a this car. (69 and up)


From the corrall:

The questions that were asked were related to the date of the additional work on the car listed above. There was ongoing debate reguarding if the parts that were late for the car were added later-by the owner. If the car was converted by Motion Perhaps just at a later date, or added by the owner at a later date. At any rate, the non period correct parts were the killers on the sale of this car as most people walked away shaking their heads. Myself included. The letter on the dash did not seem to factor into the opinions of the folks that passed on this car.

Nice car to drive however.

Phil
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-30-2004, 03:58 PM
SamLBInj SamLBInj is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Depends when I am
Posts: 1,978
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: 1967 Baldwin Motion Camaro.

[ QUOTE ]
These guys are smoking better weed then I have ever seen, maybe the only reason I can see through this BS is because I Inhale! Somebody get me a bottle of Crown Royal quick, I need some clarity in my life!
MomanMadtown

[/ QUOTE ]
Geeze, No wonder you are so confused
Just bustin on you..LOL
Sam
__________________
SamLBInj
69 Z/28 X33D80 72-B
H-D 105 FLSTC
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-30-2004, 05:07 PM
olredalert olredalert is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Marine City, Mi.
Posts: 9,385
Thanks: 32,586
Thanked 4,491 Times in 1,910 Posts
Default Re: 1967 Baldwin Motion Camaro.

Matt,

-----I did say it was far-fetched didnt I? Want to make sure that no one here thinks I believed the tripe I heard. Just reporting what I was told. Dont shoot the messenger,please!............Bill S
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-30-2004, 11:50 PM
COPO COPO is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Atlanta, GA & the Middle East
Posts: 3,024
Thanks: 400
Thanked 377 Times in 201 Posts
Default Re: 1967 Baldwin Motion Camaro.

You can read all about this car here. I've shown a couple of relevant posts from the thread below. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/show...art=1&vc=1

[ QUOTE ]
Gentlemen, something is rotten in Denmark. The 1967 Motion Camaro I bought at Auburn has problems, possibly even legal ones. It does have a letter from Joel Rosen stating that it is a real Motion car, but last year it had a letter from Joel Rosen stating it was NOT a Motion car. We have talked to the origional first buyer, and he bought it new in Oklahoma City at Hudiburg Chevrolet in the third week of June 1967. The car was made the second week of May 1967.Yes , we now have a problem!!!!!How can Joel say this car came from Baldwin and is a Motion car, when last year he wrote it was not.And in five weeks from build date to selling date off new car lot in Oklahoma?????Gentlemen, maybe we put to much importance in a letter from Joel Rosen,which received his fee from both previous owners. This is a $100,000 deal that has gone south, I have the car now , waiting for the end result, with my check having had payment stopped!!!!


[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
It was the NCIB report that found the origional dealership, to be Hudipold Chevrolet in Oklahoma City and we now know the list of all the former owners of the car, and have talked to all but one who was killed .In saying the car was unverifiable last year, Joel stated the car had come from Kline Chevrolet in Va.


[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
Well closure is near. The folks at Kruse/eBay auctions which held the large auction in Auburn are a class act. They are taking the car back at their expence and going to sell it as a clone and give the proceeds that are left after they take their due commissions out and give the remaining amount to the seller. The reason and how the new letter from Joel came into being, I will not discuss. If any of you guys frequent the classic car auctions, then you know that the Kruse,the Leake, and the Branson auction that Jim and Kathy Cox has are the top of the line. They are at the top for integrity along with the fine people at Russo-Steele and the Barrett-Jackson auctions. In a crazy world where some people try to make a fast buck, it is nice to deal with people who still do business the old fashioned way, with pride and passion for their work.


[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-31-2004, 08:34 AM
csx289 csx289 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 551
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 5 Posts
Default Re: 1967 Baldwin Motion Camaro.

FYI: The car SOLD at Barrett-Jackson in the car corral for $65k. Went to a buyer who accepted the car that was represented as a clone, and didn't care. Said he knew real ones were 2-3x the money and just wanted a car to drive.

For what I saw people paying for cars that were no more real, but just represented as such, does $65k really seem that bad? Maybe you could build it for that, but maybe not. It was originally a black L78 car, so that has got to be worth something.

Again, maybe we should ease up on guys buying what they like.As long as they don't ask us to help pay, who cares? ENTHUSIASM is what makes the hobby, NEGATIVITY is what kills it.

Sorry for the honesty, could be the drinks I had tonight.

Regards to all,
Colin
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.