Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
JoeC got it right. It was emission rules related.
The GM literature (parts books, manuals, etc) got real confusing, calling the BB a 400 alot of the time. I assume the new block handled the .030 overbore. Interestingly, the late 69 blocks did not use the 70 3 digit code format, but the late 69 axles did.
__________________
Kurt S - CRG |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
The three letter suffix began on the new 402 CID blocks.
Their cylinders were overbored by .032. Example: Code JH is 396. Code CJH is 402.(or 400 as Kurt mentioned) I have seen late built 1969 Chevelles with the three letter suffix block. Kurt S You say no 1969 Camaros have been found with the three letter suffix,even thought the 1969 Camaro model was carried over late into the 1970 model run. I would have thought those later built Camaros recieved a three letter suffix,as the Chevelles did. Anyone know why they didn't? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I would have thought those later built Camaros recieved a three letter suffix,as the Chevelles did. Anyone know why they didn't? [/ QUOTE ] I'd guess cause it was a model year extension and they chose not to change the codes midyear (though it's not really changing them, just adding a digit...). I've heard of 2 Camaro blocks with the 3 letter code, never seen them.
__________________
Kurt S - CRG |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|