Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Pit Area - Racing


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-19-2002, 09:30 PM
JoeC JoeC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: ri
Posts: 3,736
Thanks: 447
Thanked 2,456 Times in 625 Posts
Default Re: 69 Z, Headers, VS Stock Manifold and Chambered

Also try the lightest springs you can find in the carb and dist.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-20-2002, 12:11 AM
JohnF JohnF is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: 69 Z, Headers, VS Stock Manifold and Chambered

I am by no means an expert but I have been playing with different set-ups on my Z/28 for almost 24 years. Here is what has worked for me. I run 72 jets on the primary side and 76 secondary side; yellow secondary spring and 25 squirter. Headers do make a difference! I currently run the 1 3/4" Hooker Super Comps, 2 1/4" pipe to a cross flow muffler, and 2" tail pipes. The only muffler, other than stock, that performs better (and is not too loud) is a DynoMax cross flow that is listed for the Buick GN. It is a bit shorter than stock but looks good under the car and seems to flow quite well. As far as timing advance, I run 10 to 12 initial and 36 total, all in by about 2200 rpm. I have never felt that going over 38 did much to create any more power. These are not racing modifications but work very well for me on the street. I have tried everything over the years including the original manifolds, etc. With the quick timing advance you will need good gas. You may want to visit the Camaro.net site and do a search under the name JohnZ. He has studied the original 30/30 cam and gives very detailed instructions on how it should be adjusted. Again, just my opinion, but this works very well on the street.

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-20-2002, 03:42 AM
NEW NEW is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NORWAY
Posts: 311
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 69 Z, Headers, VS Stock Manifold and Chambered

Hi,,
Basically what you people are saying is ::

72/73 jets front, 76- secondary,
timing 38-42, light springs,
carb light springs.
I∆ll try sometime during christmas or slightly in to the new year..

But back to the Chambered, good, or acceptable or just nice sound?

Smog system, anyone had trouble with this?,


THANKS Great info......

NEWs [img]/ubbthreads/images/icons/smile.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/icons/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-20-2002, 01:56 PM
COPO PETE COPO PETE is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Glencoe, Ont. Canada.
Posts: 1,382
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 69 Z, Headers, VS Stock Manifold and Chambered

Chambered ain't bad, maybe Rob will chime in since he changed his. It is one of the best sounding though! I honestly think to get the best seat of the pants improvemnet is to put a M20 in it. With the M21 you will ring out first gear till your going about 50 MPH. With a M20, you will think you have woke up about 50 horse. I'll put my reputation on that!!!!...what ever my reputation is! [img]/ubbthreads/images/icons/confused.gif[/img]
Peter
__________________
Pete Simpson 1962-2013 RIP
Owen Simpson
Eric Simpson
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-20-2002, 03:27 PM
Chevy454 Chevy454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 11,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: 69 Z, Headers, VS Stock Manifold and Chambered

Well, since you asked, Pete:

Factory chambered = Crap

It all depends on what your are going after. Nothing beats the sound of chambered, but the factory system is restrictive...and I mean WAY RESTRICTIVE! Flowmaster offers a 2.5" mandrel system which uses it's own "interpretation" of a transverse muffler, or Dynomax sells a really good transverse muffler that looks fairly close to stock and flows really well, but you'll have to bend the rest of the system yourself. BUT, if I was gonna put exhaust on something that won't be submitted to a tech inspection(!), I would buy the chambered system they offer for the new Camaros/Firebirds. The system is mandrel bent, but is a LOT bigger than the original chambered of the '60s. It supposedly adds power to the late model F-bodys, and is supposed to sound AWESOME, so it must be pretty good, because those late model guys won't buy ANYTHING without seeing what it did on a chassis dyno. That, to me, would be the best of both worlds: the sound and look of chambered, but built using today's technology.

As for tips for your Z-28...I have no idea about tuning it, but don't be afraid to REV THE PISS OUT OF IT! Don't worry, your ET's will thank you for it!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-20-2002, 05:05 PM
NEW NEW is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NORWAY
Posts: 311
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 69 Z, Headers, VS Stock Manifold and Chambered

Hi,

In Norway they are very easy to deal with concerning tech inspections on cars older than 71. So i dont have to really worry abt. what i am doing concerning sound, etc..

The engine sound really nice and everything, but it is missing something, it could be that it is breathing to little.. Since it is an original car, and every thing is kept original i am really just not sure what to do..

But i think the exhaust, and the smog system does some strange things to it,,, I∆m not really sure, cause i havent run a 302 in any other form than this,

NEWs
thanks for the help, and if anyone else has any opinions........HIT ME [img]/ubbthreads/images/icons/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-20-2002, 08:52 PM
Keith Tedford Keith Tedford is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,695
Thanks: 3
Thanked 55 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: 69 Z, Headers, VS Stock Manifold and Chambered

The factory chambered exhaust has always had a reputation for being restrictive. If you drive on the highway much, the noise will quickly become annoying. I've run my spare M20 behind our L78 while having the original M21 rebuilt. Even with that engine I prefer the M20, especially in the city. What really helps a 302 to be drivable around town is the L79 cam.
__________________
Chevelleless after 46 years......but we did find a low mileage, six speed, silver 2005 Corvette. It will just have to do for now.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.