Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13  
Old 12-20-2002, 08:10 PM
sYc sYc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 8,578
Thanks: 3
Thanked 405 Times in 92 Posts
Default Re: GMMG ZL1

Stefano; As you say, for debate purposes only, which I feel is very similar to the Douglass debate. Corporate GM did not approve the use of ZL-1. Nor did the Camaro Brand Team (officially). The reason I say officially is because a couple of members of the Camaro Brand Team did lend their support, but not in their official capacities. So I guess I would have to say no, they were not built with GM's approval, either expressed or implied. As with most corporations, GM is always facing liability issues, thus are reluctant to "officially" get involved with projects generated outside of their corporate walls. This has been going on for years. I have heard numerous horror stories from original owners of Yenkos, even 1969s, about the problems of getting dealers and Chevrolet to warranty their cars. I can understand in '67 and '68, but the COPO Yenkos faced the same problems. It took 6 months for the owner of my Yenko Camaro to get a dropped valve fixed at the dealer who sold it to him, Francis Chevrolet in St. Louis. Frank Radake faced the same problem trying to get his Yenko Chevelle fixed under warranty, also at Francis. And, this in spite of all the influence Don had with Chevrolet.
__________________
Tom Clary
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.