Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Very interesting question.
I would think it would be "correct" either way. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I had a 69 Z28 with the Registered Recall letter. It was dated 1972 so I wouldn't think you would restore a 69 Z that way.
__________________
...... |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I had a recall letter for my 68 Camaro, I did what everyone else did, threw it in the garbage, very few people took there cars in for this, so I do not think this would be considered a must for a correct resto!
__________________
1968 COPO/YENKO 9737 Non-Converted |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
In the Corvette world, the resto is "as delivered to the dealer". So using that definition, no I wouldn't restore the car with the device.
__________________
Mark |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|