Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-06-2002, 06:26 PM
Belair62 Belair62 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 13,448
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Default Re: Higher value 69 Chevelle COPO 427 or L-78/L89?

SS 396 emblems may look fancier.....but it looks backward in the rearview mirror ! which is where an L89 would be if it pulled up to a light with a COPO !!! Meet you on Rte.83 Mr.70....bring your pink !!!
__________________
<span style="font-weight: bold"> (__{B}_____]]]]~~~~</span>
Don't mess with old farts - age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill! Bullshit and brilliance only come with age and experience.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-06-2002, 07:32 PM
mhassett mhassett is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: ashtabula, ohio
Posts: 641
Thanks: 1
Thanked 11 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: Higher value 69 Chevelle COPO 427 or L-78/L89?

I've been waiting to hear this comment. The L-78 has the same cam as the '66 427-425HP Corvette. The 375HP is Under-Rated, plus the L-89 is lighter. I think it would be a close race. Mark
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-06-2002, 08:32 PM
JoeC JoeC is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: ri
Posts: 3,721
Thanks: 426
Thanked 2,380 Times in 608 Posts
Default Re: Higher value 69 Chevelle COPO 427 or L-78/L89?

The reason I say Chevy lost money on the COPO cars is because of the engineering costs. Engineering costs are very high but when divided over 500,000 cars it is not that much per unit. With only about 1000 hi po COPO cars built in 1969 there was no economy of scale.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-06-2002, 10:32 PM
Belair62 Belair62 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 13,448
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Default Re: Higher value 69 Chevelle COPO 427 or L-78/L89?

There's still no substitute for cubic inches..plus I only weigh 160 lbs. so I still have the edge ! Plus Mr 70 is from the south side...they never figured out how to drive down there.

[Edited by Belair62 (01-06-2002 at 05:32 PM).]
__________________
<span style="font-weight: bold"> (__{B}_____]]]]~~~~</span>
Don't mess with old farts - age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill! Bullshit and brilliance only come with age and experience.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-07-2002, 01:30 AM
70 copo 70 copo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: chillicothe Ohio 45601
Posts: 3,834
Thanks: 219
Thanked 1,240 Times in 578 Posts
Default Re: Higher value 69 Chevelle COPO 427 or L-78/L89?

I have personally felt the power of the iron 427 and the ZL-1 in a Camaro. I guess the car that really impressed me the most in the last couple of years was the 68 NOVA that won the MCR stock appearing shootouts. This car should leave no doubt concerning the performance potential of a properly tuned 396 car.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-07-2002, 01:33 AM
COPO PETE COPO PETE is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Glencoe, Ont. Canada.
Posts: 1,382
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Higher value 69 Chevelle COPO 427 or L-78/L89?

.....if it is a 396 car!
Peter
__________________
Pete Simpson 1962-2013 RIP
Owen Simpson
Eric Simpson
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-07-2002, 09:34 AM
JoeC JoeC is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: ri
Posts: 3,721
Thanks: 426
Thanked 2,380 Times in 608 Posts
Default Re: Higher value 69 Chevelle COPO 427 or L-78/L89?

The 1969 L78 and the L72 were very similar engines and shared many parts. From memory I believe the crank, cam, 840 heads, Holley, dist, intake and exhaust manifolds were the same part numbers. The L72 just had 31 more cu in. Chevy originally rated it at 450hp then reduced it to 425hp with no modifications.

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-04-2013, 03:07 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Higher value 69 Chevelle COPO 427 or L-78/L89?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: mhassett</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I've been waiting to hear this comment. The L-78 has the same cam as the '66 427-425HP Corvette. The 375HP is Under-Rated, plus the L-89 is lighter. I think it would be a close race. Mark </div></div>I hate to say it but you are so wrong. Having had one of each back in the day, although the L78 is a strong engine it does not measure up to the427-425. The 427 was a beast compared to the 396.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.