Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Chevrolet


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #20  
Old 02-04-2025, 12:29 AM
Lynn Lynn is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 7,769
Thanks: 91
Thanked 3,574 Times in 1,507 Posts
Default

Love this truck.
Only down side is a carb in your climate. If it were in MY climate the only down side would be no AC. But, for you, pretty much a non factor.

What a beautiful truck. I searched forever for a decent 1967 - 1972 C20 to use as a tow vehicle. Kept thinking there had to be one in a barn here in OK or down in TX that had been sitting a while, retired from light farm duty.

Never did find what i wanted at a decent price (was shocked at prices, especially rust free examples) so I "settled" for my 2002 2500HD with the 8.1 and the Allison trans. Not a lot of options, but only 87k miles and drove perfectly. After new tires, and catching up on deferred maintenance, and i could not be more happy with it. I love the fuel injection, and it is so comfortable. Being an extended cab with a full 8 foot bed, i doubt I would daily drive it. But for towing, it is great.

I used a modified 68 El Camino for about 7 years for towing. It always performed flawlessly, even though I did not go fuel injection. 1968 vintage Qjet and cast iron intake worked great. My only complaint with the El Camino was that it just wasn't big and heavy enough to tow a really large load (12k pounds) if the need arose. It would do it, but I was on the edge of safety.... probably the wrong edge!

I think the only way you will know is dive in and drive it awhile, after addressing the maintenance issues. Looks like a well done engine. I would be proud to drive it anywhere. Besides, you already have it. Work out the bugs and drive the snot out of it. Enjoy.

As stated, I really like the 67 - 70 trucks. After the newer body style came out in 88 (?), I thougt they were fantastic. Very sleek and clean. For years I detested the square bodies, especially when the newer style came out. Just thought they were too big and clunky looking. They did, however perform well (for that time period) and held up very well, being easy to work on. Almost bullet proof.

Maybe it is just because ALL the full size pickups seem SOOOOO large now (little guys like me and Mitch can't get in the bed without a step ladder), that the square bodies have kind of grown on me.

But.... 67 -72 and the 88 - 98 (or 99... I don't keep up with when the body style changed) are still the best looking trucks GM ever made.
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lynn For This Useful Post:
Ryan1969Chevelle (02-04-2025)
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.