Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
05-10-2024, 02:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
well, he's a dealer/flipper so the asking price is jacked up. It is a rare find in this condition these days. Considering it needs $40,000 thrown at it to restore to a decent level $60-$65,000 might be a good buy.
Last edited by 66cayne; 05-10-2024 at 02:44 PM. 
|
|
#2
05-10-2024, 10:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Transmission is a restamp. As Danzo says, too early for C suffix which was a running change in late calendar year 1968. The POP doesn’t have a C on the transmission code. The partial VIN stamp on the transmission doesn’t match the pad stamp, easiest difference to spot is the numerals 1 and 4 which are entirely different fonts.
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to tom406 For This Useful Post: | ||
Blown32 (05-11-2024) | ||
|
#3
05-11-2024, 01:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
05-11-2024, 03:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
A good correction. Per CRG, the suffix wasn’t put on the POP after Muncie instituted the A, B, and C suffix for M20/M21/M22 production in Oct ‘68. I got too excited debunking the bad stamp
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
