Go Back   The Supercar Registry > Classified Section > Supercars/Musclecars-Wanted

Please note


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-13-2023, 04:07 AM
Too Many Projects's Avatar
Too Many Projects Too Many Projects is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Town of Troy, WI
Posts: 5,088
Thanks: 2,668
Thanked 3,934 Times in 1,776 Posts
Default

The 2000 was a new body style from the '96-99 and was all LS engines in SBC, but 5.3 for the small block. That body carries over thru 2002. I had a '95 5.7 and went to a 2000 with an LS and it is a world of difference in power and economy between the old TBI gen 1 5.7 sbc and the LS. There were 6.0 and 6.2 LS gas engines in the 2500 series that would be better suited for an enclosed trailer than the 5.3
Keep looking and you will find one you like.
__________________
Mitch
1970 Chevelle SS
1966 Chevelle SS
1967 Camaro ss/rs
1938 Business coupe, street rod
2000 FXSTS, original owner, 13k miles
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Too Many Projects For This Useful Post:
olredalert (10-13-2023), Ryan1969Chevelle (10-13-2023)
  #2  
Old 10-13-2023, 08:08 AM
Ryan1969Chevelle's Avatar
Ryan1969Chevelle Ryan1969Chevelle is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Beautiful Elora Ontario Canada
Posts: 5,965
Thanks: 586
Thanked 881 Times in 461 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Too Many Projects View Post
The 2000 was a new body style from the '96-99 and was all LS engines in SBC, but 5.3 for the small block. That body carries over thru 2002. I had a '95 5.7 and went to a 2000 with an LS and it is a world of difference in power and economy between the old TBI gen 1 5.7 sbc and the LS. There were 6.0 and 6.2 LS gas engines in the 2500 series that would be better suited for an enclosed trailer than the 5.3
Keep looking and you will find one you like.
I think the K2500 stayed OBS in 2000…… I think both new and old versions of 2000 were built.

I am confident with 4.10’s the Vortec 5.7 or 7.4 would be just fine…. Am I right/wrong?

Ryan W31
__________________


1969 Beaumont 350 Auto White Sold
1969 Beaumont 307 Auto Green Sold
1969 Chevelle SS 396-L35 Auto Blue Sold
1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass 'S' Sports Coupe W31
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-13-2023, 04:50 PM
Too Many Projects's Avatar
Too Many Projects Too Many Projects is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Town of Troy, WI
Posts: 5,088
Thanks: 2,668
Thanked 3,934 Times in 1,776 Posts
Default

Wow, just went looking and the 2500 kept the old body style thru 2002, didn't remember that. Yes, the Vortec was a big improvement over the TBI engine but the optispark wasn't the best for reliability. Remember, this engine was only produced for 5 years and it was basically a test bed for Gm to introduce full computer controls for spark and injection. It still has a distributor and only 2 injectors that just feed fuel into a plastic intake, much as the TBI did, but with Mass flow metering of air/fuel and slightly better placement of the injectors for increased performance over the TBI. It can be a good engine, but for my money, I would move up 1-2 years and get into the LS, with direct injection and distributor-less control of the spark. The increase in torque with the LS motor for towing is significant.
__________________
Mitch
1970 Chevelle SS
1966 Chevelle SS
1967 Camaro ss/rs
1938 Business coupe, street rod
2000 FXSTS, original owner, 13k miles
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.