Possible 1969 L-88 Motor

**Charley Lillard** · #1 08-15-2023, 12:28 PM

Probably a reason he doesn't show the engine pad stamping ?

Camaroinaz · #2 08-15-2023, 06:57 PM

[QUOTE=Charley Lillard;1629574]Probably a reason he doesn't show the engine pad stamping ?[/QUOT

That could be, just found it interesting that he indicated he had tracked the car down at one point.

GMC_Typhoon · #3 08-15-2023, 10:33 PM

There is a phone number from the 1984 ad.
901-365-2767. Might be in the newspaper archive seeing that the car had fresh paint interior and new soft top. Was probably advertised more than this one ad.

**John Brown** · #4 08-15-2023, 11:22 PM

Here's a picture of the block stamp. A friend WAS contemplating the purchase. His NCRS connections told him the VIN is for a March 69 build date car, but the block is stamped November 68. He's a hard pass on it.

GMC_Typhoon · #5 08-15-2023, 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Brown

Have a friend that WAS dealing on it. Here's a picture of the block stamp. His NCRS connections say the body VIN shows a March 69 build date, but the block was stamped November 68. He's a hard pass on it.

That's what I love about you guys. Y'all can't be bullshited.

Camaroinaz · #6 08-16-2023, 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Brown

Here's a picture of the block stamp. A friend WAS contemplating the purchase. His NCRS connections told him the VIN is for a March 69 build date car, but the block is stamped November 68. He's a hard pass on it.

Thanks John for the additional info. Any time I come across something like this ad, I pass it along on the off chance that someone knows the car, etc. and the possibility of reuniting a car and its original motor. This group always seems to be able to track things down and provide additional info!

SBR · #7 08-16-2023, 10:46 PM

[QUOTE=John Brown;1629611]Here's a picture of the block stamp. A friend WAS contemplating the purchase. His NCRS connections told him the VIN is for a March 69 build date car, but the block is stamped November 68. He's a hard pass on it.

He may regret that. I have seen a few original engine L88s that have a wider gap than this. Not saying that it is absolutely original but I do think it warrants further investigation.

**John Brown** · #8 08-17-2023, 02:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBR

He may regret that. I have seen a few original engine L88s that have a wider gap than this. Not saying that it is absolutely original but I do think it warrants further investigation.

He probably would have still bought it if the VIN stamped on the block matched the VIN attached to the body.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

The Following User Says Thank You to Charley Lillard For This Useful Post:
69M22Z (08-15-2023)

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GMC_Typhoon For This Useful Post:
dykstra (08-17-2023), markinnaples (08-16-2023)

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to John Brown For This Useful Post:
dykstra (08-17-2023), L_e_e (08-16-2023)

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GMC_Typhoon For This Useful Post:
dykstra (08-16-2023), olredalert (08-16-2023)

The Following User Says Thank You to Camaroinaz For This Useful Post:
dykstra (08-17-2023)

Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars.