The references in this thread keep referring to the car as a clone. "Clones" do not (or should not) have a POP showing the MN engine suffix, with a corresponding stamp on the motor, etc. I'm not suggesting the car is a real COPO, but I would not refer to this car as a "clone" either.
Perhaps this is what happens when someone goes too far with a clone? Before you know it, the car develops a realistic story, and people start thinking hey maybe it's real? Funny that the POP shows Mark Dunrite being the original owner.
Last edited by L78M22Rag; 07-06-2020 at 07:06 PM.
|
07-06-2020, 06:59 PM
Hybrid Mode
