Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-22-2018, 11:47 PM
Craig_Maiorana's Avatar
Craig_Maiorana Craig_Maiorana is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Disneyland via Lakewood N.J
Posts: 784
Thanks: 176
Thanked 89 Times in 51 Posts
Default

My question is Why does he take his "findings" to facebook and remain quiet here?

The car is an automatic so we know that excludes it from being one of the "For conversion cars"
__________________
I like cars more than I like people .....
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-23-2018, 02:22 AM
69 Post Sedan's Avatar
69 Post Sedan 69 Post Sedan is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 3,577
Thanks: 1,057
Thanked 497 Times in 177 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig_Maiorana View Post
My question is Why does he take his "findings" to facebook and remain quiet here?

The car is an automatic so we know that excludes it from being one of the "For conversion cars"
From the little I’ve seen, he doesn’t like to hear statements that oppose his views. I’ll leave it at that.......
__________________

1969 SS396 Post Sedan Delivered to Van-T Topeka KS
MCACN Day2 Concourse Gold Award

1965 VW El Lobo Dune Buggy built in the mid 70’s for the Iowa Shriners

1968 Schwinn Orange Krate
1969 Schwinn Pea Picker
1968 Schwinn 5-Speed
1970 Schwinn 3-Speed Deluxe
1972 Schwinn 10-Speed Continental
1973 Schwinn 5-Speed Suburban
All Original Paint Bikes
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to 69 Post Sedan For This Useful Post:
69hurstSC (05-23-2018), Craig_Maiorana (05-23-2018), GotGrunt (05-23-2018), ORIGLS6 (05-23-2018)
  #3  
Old 05-23-2018, 01:30 PM
69hurstSC 69hurstSC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,590
Thanks: 168
Thanked 823 Times in 179 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69 Post Sedan View Post
From the little I’ve seen, he doesn’t like to hear statements that oppose his views. I’ll leave it at that.......
That and he doesn't want a paper trail of opposing views from Yenko experts and historians associated with this car.

Maybe Marlin could shed more light. Looking at the VIN, its not even remotely close to any of the 26 confirmed cars.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-24-2018, 04:17 PM
YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY's Avatar
YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: PA
Posts: 13,097
Thanks: 720
Thanked 360 Times in 144 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69hurstSC View Post
That and he doesn't want a paper trail of opposing views from Yenko experts and historians associated with this car.

Maybe Marlin could shed more light. Looking at the VIN, its not even remotely close to any of the 26 confirmed cars.
Sure, so if this car were to be inserted into the short list of '69 Yenko Novas where we know the build week, it would look like this image. Note how the build week is not precisely in line with the known cars, but its within the range of this small sample. Same for the VIN and BODY number. Also note (for the number geeks!!!) that the body number is lower than any of them - even the 01A cars. We see this frequently, although perhaps not with this big of a difference, primarily because the date on the tag is the 'scheduled' build date and not always the 'actual' build date. Keep in mind that its the only automatic, which has slight body changes versus a manual trans....
__________________
Marlin
70 Yenko Nova-350/360, 4speed M21, 4.10 Posi (Daddy's Ride)
69 SS Nova-396/375hp, 4speed M20, 3.55 Posi (Benjamin's Ride)
67 RS Camaro-327/250hp, 2speed Glide, & 3.08 Open (Danny's Ride)

Last edited by YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY; 05-24-2018 at 06:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-24-2018, 05:14 PM
Fast67VelleN2O's Avatar
Fast67VelleN2O Fast67VelleN2O is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Mullica Hill, NJ
Posts: 4,106
Thanks: 7
Thanked 186 Times in 93 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY View Post
Sure, so if this car were to be inserted into the short list of '69 Yenko Novas where we know the build week, it would look like this image. Note how the build week is not precisely in line with the known cars, but its within the range of this small sample. Same for the VIN and BODY number. Also note (for the number geeks!!!) that the body number is lower than any of them - even the 01A cars. We see this frequently, although perhaps not with this big of a difference, primarily because the date on the tag is the 'scheduled' build date and not always the 'actual' build date. Keep in mind that its the only automatic, which has slight body changes versus a manual trans....

Now he's going to use that image as proof that it was "in the registry" and it was doctored to exclude it because this is a huge conspiracy against him. LOLOLOLOLOL
__________________
Day 2 is Life.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fast67VelleN2O For This Useful Post:
69hurstSC (05-24-2018)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.