![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: cook_dw</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If that is the same car as #13 then it would have the holes in the trunk area just below the bumper for the full bumper guards vs the bumperettes that are currently on there. Also didn't the pilot and very early cars that got guards did not have the rubber cushions.??.. Or was that a situation where there were 2 suppliers? </div></div>
Darrel, We are evaluating to see if the bumperettes were properly physically attached to the car or staged for the photos using something else to attach them for the photo shoot?? Yes we will be looking for the holes during the restoration. BTW... good news- #N100013 is getting Lacquer paint just like N100001 did. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
We are evaluating to see if the bumperettes were properly physically attached to the car or staged for the photos using something else to attach them for the photo shoot?? Yes we will be looking for the holes during the restoration. BTW... good news- #N100013 is getting Lacquer paint just like N100001 did. </div></div> could the bumperettes have been added to the photo by airbrush? It was common back in the day to add or remove options or emblems by airbrush like to day you can alter a photo digitally with Photoshop |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|