![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: WILMASBOYL78</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Calling Sammy..you are wanted on the phone.
</div></div> I'm disappointed [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/frown.gif[/img] ...the guru of drag racing information has been missing in acton [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/dunno.gif[/img]
__________________
02 Berger 380hp #95 Lots of L78 Novas Join National Nostalgic Nova! 70 Orange Cooler 69 Camaro |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In '68, there was no factor for SS/HA. The last factor was F and it was for 9.50 or more. That's what the rule book says anyway. The '69 rule book lists:
F: 8.00-8.49 G: 8.50-8.99 H: 9.00-9.49 The way the numbers jump around,it makes you wonder if they used Weight/CI one year and Weight/HP the other year, but the books don't explain that. Based on those numbers you couldn't run the same class in '68 and '69 with the same car. Since Super Stock is based on Stock classes, I'd think the factor should be based on HP rating because modifications were very limited. Verne |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Verne. Now I get to ask the stupid question. I am new at this so I want to be sure I am calculating this correctly. Do I divide the weight of the vehicle by the factors to determine the HP range that is acceptable?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, that would do it as long as the factors are based weight per HP and not weight per CID.
Verne |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|