Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
01-14-2016, 03:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Charley's old mount....
It had the repro tag on it when it did the record $ 800k or so at the '05 Mecum auction in St. Charles, IL. I heard it had the original tag at that time but I would think it would have been put back on when it was restored again?
|
|
#2
01-14-2016, 05:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Charley's old mount....
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: camaromb</div><div class="ubbcode-body">It had the repro tag on it when it did the record $ 800k or so at the '05 Mecum auction in St. Charles, IL. I heard it had the original tag at that time but I would think it would have been put back on when it was restored again? </div></div>
If it really did have the OE tag on it at that time why did they use the wrong body number on the repro?
__________________
Learning more and more about less and less...
|
|
#3
01-14-2016, 09:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Charley's old mount....
It had the repro tag on it in '05 but "the owners" had the original tag I was told at the time. Obviously the original has not made it back to the body if it really existed. If they didn't use the correct body number on the repo tag then the original trim tag must be long gone.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
