![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
FWIW, I asked a friend about his '68 SS396 Camaro he bought new, and it was a relatively early '68. He says it definitely was not as shiny as the rest of the car.
__________________
![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thank you Phil, that is what I always understood. There was no reason to used two different gloss leves.
Nice to know about the temp variation too, helps understand the inconsistencies, and FWIW I will remain in the not glossy rear panel camp... [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img] "<span style="color: #FF0000">The paint was the same paint used on the rockers.</span>" |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|