![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes I already printed the form out I just need to get the form notorized saying the title is in my nane. I hope I am lucky enough to get something back. Bob you are the 2nd guy who said try a black light I will have to get one.
I had to change the headlight switch and it had a fuel line clamp holding the 2 lines together any body ever see that. The headlight switch in the picture is the new one I was putting in. ![]()
__________________
69 RS SS L78 conv 69 RS SS ZL1 69 L78 Chevelle conv 69 L78 Nova 69 L34 Nova 67 SS Chevelle 73 Trans Am |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does any body know the thickness of a 69 Chevy big block deck pad that hasnt been decked. The first shot is a block thats been decked the second is a non decked block but it is a 74 dated block.
Wouldnt this be a sure way of being able to identify a restamp ![]() ![]()
__________________
69 RS SS L78 conv 69 RS SS ZL1 69 L78 Chevelle conv 69 L78 Nova 69 L34 Nova 67 SS Chevelle 73 Trans Am |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Interesting approach...seems logical. I'm sure the experts will let you know soon.
wilma
__________________
02 Berger 380hp #95 Lots of L78 Novas Join National Nostalgic Nova! 70 Orange Cooler 69 Camaro |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ssl78</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Does any body know the thickness of a 69 Chevy big block deck pad that hasnt been decked. The first shot is a block thats been decked the second is a non decked block but it is a 74 dated block.
Wouldnt this be a sure way of being able to identify a restamp ![]() ![]() </div></div> My educated opinion is that would not give a conclusive answer. There are core shifts in castings and that is why some have thin cylinder walls on 1 side after a re-bore and also why the thrust surface where the cam is installed is off center often. Because of these shifts that pad probably falls into a range that could vary .100 (swag) whereas a deck may be as little as a clean up cut or a blueprint (zero deck height to piston tops). There are so many variables that nothing conclusive could be measured from that pad thickness,IMO.
__________________
69 SS/RS 396 M20 X22 Nor 12B,72B,712 bought 1979 FULL OWNER HISTORY 69 Dick Harrell tribute Day II 427 M20 4.10 X11 76 orig pnt, 711 67 Super Stock 302 Camaro re-creation |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: bbbentley</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
My educated opinion is that would not give a conclusive answer.....There are so many variables that nothing conclusive could be measured from that pad thickness,IMO. </div></div> X3
__________________
Bill Pritchard 73 Camaro RS Z28, L82, M20, C60 |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|