![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: NiteOwl</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Ryan1969Chevelle</div><div class="ubbcode-body">This thread is catchy.
Ryan Good stance? ![]() </div></div> Love your '68, and I had a 138 code 4 spd years ago. I think, just FYI, that the SS front plate might be upside down? That 68 sits way too high in the back! Here's a shot I took without the blond distraction in front... (Oh that's Missy) ![]()
__________________
1968 Camaro Ex-ISCA Show Car - Sold ![]() On The Lookout For My Next Classic... John 10:30 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Need some opinions:
Do you like the rake better on the orange car (L60 higher in back, F60 lower in front) Or the black car (Same setup but lower in back, higher in front). I really like the look of the convertible (it looks more day 2 ish, you would think twice if that car pulled up next to you, more so than the black car, the black car just looks almost too stock). Curious what others thought. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: markinnaples</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
Love your '68, and I had a 138 code 4 spd years ago. I think, just FYI, that the SS front plate might be upside down? </div></div> Thanks and it is... lol... Some people realize it, most don't! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thought I would get some comments on the stance of the black ebody vs the convert. I chickened out, and I am ordering new stock strings (vs super stock) to match the look of the black hemi car, and will lower the front end (more than the black car) to achieve the right 'stance'.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|