The First Yenko?

[Kurt S]

Agreed. Funky tag.
I'd have to see it better, but the history on the car says there is no reason for the tag to be modified - when it was found it was just a car.

[mr 707]

clearly the tag had been off the car at one time or another

[iluv69s]

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: COPO140</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Thanks for the reply Kurt. According to the cowl tag that was on the car when it was found, it was produced 08B and has a body number of 1557. </div></div>

Does anyone know if any of this is accurate, considering the cowl tag that is on the car seems pretty ridiculous ?? And I assume the hidden VINs match the State issued VIN ?? Is any possibility that the Yenko list has a typo and this is not really a Yenko car?? I assume the NCRS was checked? Just thinking out loud ... Hmmmm

I'm still amazed at the selling price.... Wowwwwww !!

[COPO140]

Yes, the hidden VINs are original and do match the state issued VIN that is on the car. The current cowl tag on the car is most certainly not the original. Frankly, I would not put a lot of stock in the fact that the tag was accurate when the car was found as the tag had been of the car prior to the car being found. I agree, there was no reason to fool with the tag as it was &quot;just a Camaro&quot; when found. I will see if I can come up with some &quot;as found&quot; pictures later. The car was actually a pretty clean driver.

[COPO140]

Here are a couple of pictures as found.

[camaromb]

Yes they have already been posted, Clint?

[COPO140]

Yes sir.