![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If seller owned both cars, why were the wrong trim tag numbers shown? A lot of mystery here. If I was the buyer and didn't know about this info, I would be wondering why it was such a deal.
__________________
Bill |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The seller never was able to figure out the real body number for ZL1 # 48.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Billohio</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If seller owned both cars, why were the wrong trim tag numbers shown? A lot of mystery here. If I was the buyer and didn't know about this info, I would be wondering why it was such a deal. </div></div>
Correct me if I am wrong... photos were posted here by a member of a body that was apparently at a body shop to be restored. This body had incorrect dates and body piercings to be the real ZL-1 in question. A friend of owner came on and stated that the car in the photos was not the real ZL-1 that his friend owned and posted photos of another body and a 3 x 5 card with the body number off the cowl tag from his friend's car written. This body number was incorrect for the ZL-1 in question. Now the car at the auction has an admitted fake cowl tag with yet another incorrect body number for ZL-1 number 48. I guess my question is, who owned the car at the body shop??? ... and thank God the body numbers are secret and not in order !!! |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|