Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 04-21-2013, 03:05 AM
Lynn Lynn is online now
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 7,838
Thanks: 94
Thanked 3,620 Times in 1,529 Posts
Default Re: Is "stance" important?

Stance IS important.

So is camera angle.

Please ignore the paint. Has been polished in a couple places, wet sanded and unpolished in others, and still completely uncut in others.
Hoping to paint stripes this week, then sand the whole car and have it buffed.
The following 3 shots were all taken within seconds of each other. No changes made to the car. The car in reality sits 5/8 inch lower in the front. Factory Z/28 would sit .38 inch higher in the front (of course, the AIM calls ro +- .38, so who knows).

From some angles the car actually looks lower in rear, and some it looks way higher in the rear.
Original size tires on the car for now. I have the YH wheels for it, but these are FW. Still need to blast and paint the YH wheels.
BTW, I also like the stance on my old 306,000 mile bimmer in the back ground on shot #3.
Attached Images
   
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.