Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-03-2013, 07:24 PM
tom406 tom406 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Newcastle, WA USA
Posts: 2,195
Thanks: 396
Thanked 3,734 Times in 791 Posts
Default Re: Is "stance" important?

Mustangs and Camaros seem to suffer most from tip toe "new spring" syndrome. I'm REALLY happy with the stance of the original GT springs on my '66 fastback on '65 Shelby wheels...
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-03-2013, 09:12 PM
427TJ's Avatar
427TJ 427TJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: PNW
Posts: 5,578
Thanks: 1,007
Thanked 294 Times in 164 Posts
Default Re: Is "stance" important?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: tom406</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Mustangs and Camaros seem to suffer most from tip toe &quot;new spring&quot; syndrome. I'm REALLY happy with the stance of the original GT springs on my '66 fastback on '65 Shelby wheels... </div></div>

Wow Tom, that Mustang is a keeper. Or sell it to me.

I think it was Pat Ganahl who said there's one word to describe the perfectly done car: &quot;Stance, stance stance!&quot;
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.