Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
#1
03-25-2013, 04:47 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Is "stance" important?
Sometimes the stance can make or break the look. I think it is integral for the correct muscle car era. Come on, show us yours!
__________________
Jersey Jeff 69 Day-2 L89 T400 BX 2015 ZL-1 Auto 98 Surburban Last edited by ss427copo; 12-08-2019 at 04:23 AM. Reason: None 
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ss427copo For This Useful Post: | ||
67SS4spd (06-17-2024), PeteLeathersac (05-20-2021) | ||
|
#2
03-25-2013, 12:45 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
The only decent shot I've got right now--hope to change that soon though.
|
|
#3
03-25-2013, 12:53 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
Stance is important to get it right if you are going for the original height on a 1970 Chevelle SS. The back was always lower than the front [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img]
__________________
"NOSTALGIA It takes us to a place were we ache to go again"
|
|
#4
03-25-2013, 12:58 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
https://www.yenko.net/attachments/use..._09_17_663.jpg
Here is mine 2 inch cal-trac rear leaf springs and moroso drag springs 2 coils cut out
__________________
8 Second Yenko Nova Clone 86 Buick Grand National 71 Rally Nova 02 GMMG Hot Rod Edition Camaro #1987 02 Camaro Z28
|
|
#5
03-25-2013, 12:59 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
Lets not froget about my Mopar, The 1970 Challenger had one of the lowest stances in stock original form for a factory muscle car.
__________________
"NOSTALGIA It takes us to a place were we ache to go again"
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to XXXGoldL34M20 For This Useful Post: | ||
napa68 (07-22-2020) | ||
|
#6
03-25-2013, 01:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
The stance is absolutely vital, whether it be the stock stance or the modified look - one inch in the wrong direction can make it or break it, IMHO.
Stock:  Modified: 
__________________
Marlin 70 Yenko Nova-350/360, 4speed M21, 4.10 Posi (Daddy's Ride) 69 SS Nova-396/375hp, 4speed M20, 3.55 Posi (Benjamin's Ride) 67 RS Camaro-327/250hp, 2speed Glide, & 3.08 Open (Danny's Ride)
|
|
#8
03-25-2013, 01:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is "stance" important?
  
__________________
......
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Charley Lillard For This Useful Post: | ||
BonzoHansen (01-04-2021), dykstra (04-05-2020) | ||
|
#9
03-25-2013, 02:08 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
I don't see it as being lower Dan.The rocker looks horizontal to the ground.If you make a print of your pic and draw a line through the centres of the wheels and the bottom of the rocker,you will find the lines are parallel.I think if you measure the front of the rocker and compare it to the back,they will be very close.
I always remember back in 70 that when my LS6 was loaded for the track that the back went down.2 slicks on steel wheels with a tool box and a 24 of "50" was too much for stock springs.  <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: XXXBlackLs6M22</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Stance is important to get it right if you are going for the original height on a 1970 Chevelle SS. The back was always lower than the front [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img] </div></div>
|
|
#10
03-25-2013, 02:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
Always been a fan of the factory stance.
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Mr70 For This Useful Post: | ||
396 SS/RS (06-15-2024) | ||
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
