Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The reason I ask is this:
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Da Grump (in The Chevrolet Racing Engine)</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The 4224 idle circuit requires some "fixing" in order to achieve a clean idle with a radical engine. The idle circuit in the number 5913 primary metering block supplied with the 4224 was originally designed for a carb with a power-valve system. The 4224 doesn't have a power-valve circuit and the idle circuit may be very rich with the normal race engine idle settings.</div></div> And then he goes on to the bit about the 0.017" diameter wire in the idle feed restriction. I was reading that the other night, and I thought "why not just put a power valve in it then? I drive on the street, and it might cut down on some unnecessary fuel consumption while cleaning up the idle and off-idle mixtures at the same time!" I don't experience backfires very much, but I figure I'd probably install power valve protector check valves while modifying the carbs for power valves.
__________________
~Pete I know enough to know that I don't know enough. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Power valve circuit should help you.
When we ran the 540 on the dyno, the A.F. ratio was down in the 11.0 range. Way to fat for a street car. Bobby Myers added a power valve to the Dominator by removing the block off and drilling two holes into the metering plate to feed fuel to the power valve. After moving down 4 jet sizes, the average A.F. ratio was in the 14.5 range at idle and through the pull.
__________________
It's not the critic that counts, not the man who points out how the strong man stumbled or whether the doer of deeds could have done them better... |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: TheNovaMan</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The reason I ask is this:
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Da Grump (in The Chevrolet Racing Engine)</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The 4224 idle circuit requires some "fixing" in order to achieve a clean idle with a radical engine. The idle circuit in the number 5913 primary metering block supplied with the 4224 was originally designed for a carb with a power-valve system. The 4224 doesn't have a power-valve circuit and the idle circuit may be very rich with the normal race engine idle settings.</div></div> And then he goes on to the bit about the 0.017" diameter wire in the idle feed restriction. I was reading that the other night, and I thought "why not just put a power valve in it then? I drive on the street, and it might cut down on some unnecessary fuel consumption while cleaning up the idle and off-idle mixtures at the same time!" I don't experience backfires very much, but I figure I'd probably install power valve protector check valves while modifying the carbs for power valves. </div></div>* Also a vacuum advance helps clean up the idle with Tunnel Ram too.
__________________
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|