![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RNDSTARSTORM@AOL.COM
If you could email me I could send a pic, not sure how to load pics on this site. Thanks for your time, Randy |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Randy, Sometimes data falls into place very well to answer questions. I received the photos you sent and I can tell you that the front bearing retainer is the large diameter, meaning that the trans was from a 409 car using the 553 bellhousing. The VIN font is definitely from a Tarrytown built car. Tarrytown was one of the plants that tended to forget the letter code before the sequence number and also, they had a problem with the digit "1" during the '62 model year and replaced them with a "1" that was a little taller than the rest of the numerals (as yours is). Also, figuring the final production date of your car at the Tarrytown plant, it was assembled 1-2 days before the end of November, which matches the trans assembly date.
I don't know if any of this really helps you in any way, but the research is always interesting for me. Verne [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img] |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I really apriciate all of your information and knowledge. You have really helped me out. So this is defeinety worth rebuiding.
I also have another t-10, case date # is WE74 2(4 speed may 1964)no vin stamp, same casting #s as the first trans, identical internals and retainer. Think it is a service replacement? And again thanks for all of your time, Randy |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|