E-Bay '69 Yenko Disguised As a Z-28 Clone!

[vfitom]

Tracker, you state: "car retains one hidden VIN". Thus, If you have the original car with that original hidden vin, and you legally have the title with that listed VIN, YOU own that car.

[Tracker1]

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: vfitom</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Tracker, you state: &quot;car retains one hidden VIN&quot;. Thus, If you have the original car with that original hidden vin, and you legally have the title with that listed VIN, YOU own that car. </div></div>

The rub is the title and the VIN plate reside with another individual who cut it out years ago. That aside, so, with your experience, you are saying a hidden VIN trumps an actual VIN plate on the dash in establishing the existence of &quot;a car&quot;? Cuz what I have is a pile of scrap metal with a matching engine block. What Bergy has is a whole car with VIN on the dash. You're saying - or at least intimating - is that because that VIN tag on the dash is removable it isn't as legitimate as a hidden VIN? (I'm just deducting out,here, from what you said in your post...allow me some leeway) So if Bergy had found this car with the hidden VINs on the cowl and behind the heater box in place BUT no VIN tag on the dash he'd be better off? Not challenging, just trying to learn.

[sYc]

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tracker1</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: vfitom</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Tracker, you state: &quot;car retains one hidden VIN&quot;. Thus, If you have the original car with that original hidden vin, and you legally have the title with that listed VIN, YOU own that car. </div></div>

.....- is that because that VIN tag on the dash is removable it isn't as legitimate as a hidden VIN? (I'm just deducting out,here, from what you said in your post...allow me some leeway) So if Bergy had found this car with the hidden VINs on the cowl and behind the heater box in place BUT no VIN tag on the dash he'd be better off? </div></div>


Yes..and yes...

[COPO140]

&quot;What Bergy has is a whole car with VIN on the dash&quot;


Above is a quote from Tracker's post. Unless I missed something, this has not been proven. This is the kind of crap that gets me going. Why would you say this tracker unless you know something that the rest of us don't?

[Tracker1]

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: COPO140</div><div class="ubbcode-body">&quot;What Bergy has is a whole car with VIN on the dash&quot;


Above is a quote from Tracker's post. Unless I missed something, this has not been proven. This is the kind of crap that gets me going. Why would you say this tracker unless you know something that the rest of us don't? </div></div>

COPO140, I don't believe you can deny that Bergy has a whole car with a Yenko VIN on the dash, that's all I was saying. What is being debated is if he has THE whole car that goes WITH that VIN or not. I don't know if he does or if he doesn't anymore than you do. I was just trying to establish if a shell with a hidden VIN and no VIN tag was more legitimate or desirable than a shell with just a dash VIN tag. I was not referring to bergy's car as a whole &quot;yenko&quot; car, just a whole car. Please place panties on ironing board, apply steam.

And, yes Jireh, it is time to get back to work. [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/smile.gif[/img]