Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-06-2010, 02:38 PM
kwhizz kwhizz is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: LS Make'um Better Guy
Posts: 7,747
Thanks: 861
Thanked 683 Times in 202 Posts
Default Re: LT1 compared to L79

Just for what it's worth.......In reference to my 66 Nova L-79 car.....In 67 I installed a Sig Erson solid Lifter camshaft and 4:88 gears and with a Edelbrock crossram the car went a best of 11.73 and with a Z-28 single 4 barrel the car would run 12.10 all day long.........

Ken
__________________


The Best things in life......Aren't Things
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-06-2010, 04:53 PM
ORIGLS6 ORIGLS6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Fishin' in the Dark
Posts: 7,410
Thanks: 1,102
Thanked 509 Times in 145 Posts
Default Re: LT1 compared to L79

4.88 gears and 11.73 ET. Without knowing tire size (little low-end torque - short tire) I'm guessing you were hitting the traps around 7600-7800??? [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/shocked.gif[/img] [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/worship.gif[/img]
__________________
Don't mistake education for intelligence. I worked with educated people. I socialize with intelligent people.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-06-2010, 05:26 PM
kwhizz kwhizz is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: LS Make'um Better Guy
Posts: 7,747
Thanks: 861
Thanked 683 Times in 202 Posts
Default Re: LT1 compared to L79

Geez!!! I can't even remember what I had for dinner last night......But.....I do remember that I came out of the hole at 7000 rpm.......I wouldn't have the balls to do that today.....LOL

Ken
__________________


The Best things in life......Aren't Things
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-06-2010, 06:27 PM
SmallHurst SmallHurst is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Lees Summit, MO
Posts: 1,394
Thanks: 11
Thanked 95 Times in 43 Posts
Default Re: LT1 compared to L79

I have heard that about small torque/ high horsepower small blocks.... Wind them up till they are screaming for mercy and pull another gear!!!!

I had a friend that did something like this. Tube frame Vega, sheet metal interior, 327 bored to 331, twin Holleys on a hi-rise, full roller valve train, 5.33 gearing, going through the 1/8th mile at about 8K!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
Snarl softly and carry a big stick!
1969 Hurst/Olds
13.26 @ 103.12 Pure Stock

Rusty Small
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-07-2010, 01:35 AM
olredalert olredalert is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Marine City, Mi.
Posts: 9,411
Thanks: 32,845
Thanked 4,522 Times in 1,922 Posts
Default Re: LT1 compared to L79


----While this is off the beam a bit it does have some relevance.
----When I first took over the &quot;Red Alert&quot; helm in 1990 the car hadnt been changed substantially since Bob H had run it. He ran that 3980lbs 70 LS6 SS/DA Chevelle with 5:88s thru the quarter. Someone else can figure out the RPMs with a 33 inch tall tire, but I knew I didnt want to run the car thru the traps at anywhere near that RPM. Point being,,,A good light weight bottom end is everything. Keep the rods attached to the crank and you can twist almost any motor tight. Well built small-blocks have a built in edge (low reciprocating weight), and almost any HP small-block can make big RPM with that in mind. Big-blocks can also reap those same benefits when the reciprocating assembly is built light and the stroke is believeable.......Bill S
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.