Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-12-2010, 06:05 PM
YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY's Avatar
YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: PA
Posts: 13,097
Thanks: 720
Thanked 358 Times in 142 Posts
Default Re: E-Bay '69 Yenko Disguised As a Z-28 Clone!

[img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/laugh.gif[/img]
__________________
Marlin
70 Yenko Nova-350/360, 4speed M21, 4.10 Posi (Daddy's Ride)
69 SS Nova-396/375hp, 4speed M20, 3.55 Posi (Benjamin's Ride)
67 RS Camaro-327/250hp, 2speed Glide, &amp; 3.08 Open (Danny's Ride)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-12-2010, 06:47 PM
sYc sYc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 8,578
Thanks: 3
Thanked 403 Times in 91 Posts
Default Re: E-Bay '69 Yenko Disguised As a Z-28 Clone!

Regardless of how the stamped numbers got there, how do you rectify the problem? The VIN plate does not match the stamped/hidden numbers, a serious problem both legally and in our hobby.
__________________
Tom Clary
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-12-2010, 07:37 PM
vfitom vfitom is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: PA USA
Posts: 58
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: E-Bay '69 Yenko Disguised As a Z-28 Clone!

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sYc</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Regardless of how the stamped numbers got there, how do you rectify the problem? </div></div> Via a state issued replacement VIN plate that attaches to the firewall with the state assigning their specific VIN if the original/correct/born with VIN cannot be determined, and thus a new branded title being issued with this newly assigned VIN. Firewall must first be examined in this case to see if it were actually replaced and what numbers are there now. If it were not replaced, the VIN that is on it now would become the VIN listed on the state issued plate because that is the car's born with VIN and is known. That's why it is placed there. 616414 could never be listed on the state issued replacement VIN tag. Only THAT car's original, born with VIN or the state's assigned VIN could be listed on the state issued tag and placed on this car. Thus, there goes a SYC by the wayside. That 616414 VIN tag should not be on that car, firewall replacement or not. That VIN tag should not be placed on any other car body, even a Dynacorn or the like. That VIN tag should be in a case on the shelf, hanging on a wall, and looked at. Or sent to the Yenko VIN tag graveyard.
__________________
RWB-1
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-12-2010, 07:46 PM
bergy's Avatar
bergy bergy is online now
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pennsylvania, Florida
Posts: 2,785
Thanks: 821
Thanked 1,393 Times in 382 Posts
Default Re: E-Bay '69 Yenko Disguised As a Z-28 Clone!

I agree Tom. It is an interesting issue. My earlier example consisting of transferring just the small piece(s) of sheet metal where the stamps are located would, in my opinion, not result in the second car (the one that received the small cut out) being the new legal car (particularly if the new car got a brand, spanking, new duplicate vin plate). It's also very interesting to go down the rabbit trail that vfitom introduced yesterday. If, in fact, two #616414's existed - and it could be proven that a crime was involved in one or the other acquisition/transaction, and, the crime actually precipitated the transaction - wouldn't/couldn't that transaction be nullified in PA? In this example, that may be one of the avenues toward the rectification that you questioned.

All really good, interesting stuff. I hope that this isn't boring a bunch of people. Heck - so far this exercise has only cost me $500.00 per page of this thread - I'm not bored!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-12-2010, 10:28 PM
L78steve L78steve is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hendersonville NC
Posts: 944
Thanks: 7
Thanked 33 Times in 30 Posts
Default Re: E-Bay '69 Yenko Disguised As a Z-28 Clone!

Not boring me. I'm learning a lot.
__________________
"Knowledge is good" Emil Fabor
67 L/78 Camaro SS/RS H-H,1W,2LGSR,3SL,4K,5BY. (Sold)
70 L/78 Nova M-21,Black Cherry,Sandalwood Int.
09 Pontiac G8 GT Premium,Sport,Roof. Liquid Red.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-13-2010, 12:04 AM
YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY's Avatar
YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: PA
Posts: 13,097
Thanks: 720
Thanked 358 Times in 142 Posts
Default Re: E-Bay '69 Yenko Disguised As a Z-28 Clone!

Funny you mention the vin from one car to another based on a crime - that very scenario happened to another Yenko Camaro right here in SE Pennsylvania!

Long story, but true Yenko with the Yenko vin stamped in the f/wall trumped the other car that had 'no' vin on the f/wall - although it had the original Yenko's vin tag in the dash. The wrong car showed up on EBaY of all places, and was physically located just 30 minutes from the real Yenko - unreal. (As of now the wrong car has no vin plate on the dash, the State Police reopened the case and physically removed it about 2-3 years ago, the theft happened in the 80's!)

Honestly, you can't make some of this crazy stuff up!
__________________
Marlin
70 Yenko Nova-350/360, 4speed M21, 4.10 Posi (Daddy's Ride)
69 SS Nova-396/375hp, 4speed M20, 3.55 Posi (Benjamin's Ride)
67 RS Camaro-327/250hp, 2speed Glide, &amp; 3.08 Open (Danny's Ride)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-13-2010, 12:21 AM
x  Baldwin  Motion's Avatar
x Baldwin Motion x  Baldwin  Motion is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: 41N 72 18.5W Sag Harbor NY
Posts: 6,640
Thanks: 217
Thanked 178 Times in 68 Posts
Default Re: E-Bay '69 Yenko Disguised As a Z-28 Clone!

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY</div><div class="ubbcode-body">..........

Honestly, you can't make some of this crazy stuff up! </div></div>


I think some people stay up late working on the next round of nutty!! [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/crazy.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-13-2010, 01:29 AM
bergy's Avatar
bergy bergy is online now
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pennsylvania, Florida
Posts: 2,785
Thanks: 821
Thanked 1,393 Times in 382 Posts
Default Re: E-Bay '69 Yenko Disguised As a Z-28 Clone!

Here's another tid bit - many folks may not know that there is a mandate for all of the individual state DMVs to communicate with each other. I believe that the deadline in PA was this past Spring. Of course, many states are running behind. I personally wouldn't be surprised if there are a lot of vin's that are duplicated in different states. That's gonna be a real dog's breakfast! It just points out the need for ownership documentation folks. You probably remember when POPs were considered rock solid documentation - now, even the experts get fooled. Block stamping - the same way. With the value of these cars, somebody's gonna figure out how to stamp cowls - perfectly. Never say never.
I gotta get back to work on this project - I may not check in for a while - out of country next week.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-13-2010, 01:35 AM
Tracker1's Avatar
Tracker1 Tracker1 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ONTARIO
Posts: 3,363
Thanks: 917
Thanked 974 Times in 467 Posts
Default Re: E-Bay '69 Yenko Disguised As a Z-28 Clone!

&quot;616414 could never be listed on the state issued replacement VIN tag. Only THAT car's original, born with VIN or the state's assigned VIN could be listed on the state issued tag and placed on this car. Thus, there goes a SYC by the wayside. That 616414 VIN tag should not be on that car, firewall replacement or not. That VIN tag should not be placed on any other car body, even a Dynacorn or the like. That VIN tag should be in a case on the shelf, hanging on a wall, and looked at. Or sent to the Yenko VIN tag graveyard.&quot;

I agree Tom. But, luckily, we're not even close to that final point yet. Look forward to the outcome of firewall pics and inspection. I am in a situation right now - I fished a 1969 Dodge Daytona out of a graveyard last weekend, car retains one hidden VIN, found its original motor too. Another dude cut the VIN tag and fender tags off it years ago. We are both at loggerheads over who owns the car. [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/frown.gif[/img] Different from this situation, but still in the VIN gray area.
__________________
I ain't nobody, dork.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-13-2010, 02:03 AM
YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY's Avatar
YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: PA
Posts: 13,097
Thanks: 720
Thanked 358 Times in 142 Posts
Default Re: E-Bay '69 Yenko Disguised As a Z-28 Clone!

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: bergy</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Here's another tid bit - many folks may not know that there is a mandate for all of the individual state DMVs to communicate with each other. I believe that the deadline in PA was this past Spring. Of course, many states are running behind. I personally wouldn't be surprised if there are a lot of vin's that are duplicated in different states. That's gonna be a real dog's breakfast! It just points out the need for ownership documentation folks. You probably remember when POPs were considered rock solid documentation - now, even the experts get fooled. Block stamping - the same way. With the value of these cars, somebody's gonna figure out how to stamp cowls - perfectly. Never say never.
I gotta get back to work on this project - I may not check in for a while - out of country next week. </div></div>

Funny thing is, in my example above, the original Yenko went and got its State Police issued replacement vin plate from PA. Years later the fake Yenko showed up in PA (!, of all 50 states....) but with the real cars vin, do you think he got a title issued from PA with that original vin? Yep! When 1 state can't figure out that there are two cars after the same vin, in the same state - I'm not putting too much trust in the interstate validation effort. To think that a rebodied car showed up 30 miles away from the real one, and got titled, is a head scratcher! Trust me, I'm up late many a night - but its never over stuff like this!
__________________
Marlin
70 Yenko Nova-350/360, 4speed M21, 4.10 Posi (Daddy's Ride)
69 SS Nova-396/375hp, 4speed M20, 3.55 Posi (Benjamin's Ride)
67 RS Camaro-327/250hp, 2speed Glide, &amp; 3.08 Open (Danny's Ride)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.