Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Lounge


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-18-2009, 08:55 PM
69Tom 69Tom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 594
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: No more Big Blocks....R.I.P.

That's a sad day. I shall tip one back in honor of my grandfather's time spent there.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-18-2009, 10:09 PM
Chevy454 Chevy454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 11,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: No more Big Blocks....R.I.P.

Bummer...but should be no surprise. The only market they had for the 8100 was in marine & commercial applications...and GM is leaving the the medium duty truck market by canceling the Topkick/Kodiak lines. The 8.1L was a *dandy* engine (we own 2), but GM's hand was forced by our own government & it's ever tightening emissions/economy regulations...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-19-2009, 12:11 AM
Born30YrsLate Born30YrsLate is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Green Bay, WI
Posts: 1,854
Thanks: 0
Thanked 27 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: No more Big Blocks....R.I.P.

Yes...sad indeed...I am also looking at it as they are now building small blocks with the same cubic inches AND more horsepower as the famous big blocks from of old...although there is no replacement for displacement...except for maybe a supercharger/turbo....
__________________
I don't think it was coincidence that the Great Depression happened during Prohibition...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-19-2009, 12:26 AM
Mr. Chevy's Avatar
Mr. Chevy Mr. Chevy is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Northern Ohio
Posts: 4,616
Thanks: 286
Thanked 706 Times in 349 Posts
Default Re: No more Big Blocks....R.I.P.

I'm certain the Federal Government has a hand in this.. They don't want these motors around anymore... Very Sad

Rich
__________________
"This is Sheriff Buford T. Justice, I'm in pursuit of a black Trans Am, he is all mine so stay out of the way"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-19-2009, 04:36 AM
Charley Lillard Charley Lillard is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Woodland, ca. US
Posts: 16,044
Thanks: 527
Thanked 4,969 Times in 1,263 Posts
Default Re: No more Big Blocks....R.I.P.

They are obsolete. Drive a Duramax or strong LS engine and you will see why nobody needs the old big blocks anymore.
__________________
......
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-23-2009, 10:13 PM
old5.0 old5.0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 921
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: No more Big Blocks....R.I.P.

[ QUOTE ]
They are obsolete. Drive a Duramax or strong LS engine and you will see why nobody needs the old big blocks anymore.

[/ QUOTE ]

I drive a new 6.0 powered 3/4 ton Chevy every day at my job, and I have to say it's stronger than any older 454 truck I've ever been around.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-23-2009, 11:44 PM
Chevy454 Chevy454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 11,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: No more Big Blocks....R.I.P.

[ QUOTE ]
They are obsolete. Drive a Duramax or strong LS engine and you will see why nobody needs the old big blocks anymore.

[/ QUOTE ]
LOL...true to a point, but the Dmax is terribly complex/expensive, and the LS engine in the HD series won't pull with the big block...my opinion, the 8.1L was *the best* bang for the buck for a no-nonsense HD/towing application. No, you won't have the unloaded fuel mileage of a Dmax (loaded they're nearly identical), but the 496 is 10x easier to maintain or diagnose than it's diesel counterpart. And, last I knew, the 8.1L carried the highest *legal* GVW in the 3500 chassis (before they axed the engine option)...

Not to mention the added initial cost, added maintenance costs, etc...don't get me wrong, we own 2 Dmax trucks and love them, but we also own 2 8.1L trucks...and I hated seeing the 8.1L option go.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-23-2009, 11:59 PM
PxTx's Avatar
PxTx PxTx is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Glenside, PA 19038
Posts: 2,632
Thanks: 30
Thanked 59 Times in 43 Posts
Default Re: No more Big Blocks....R.I.P.

I love my 8.1 and the 6.0 doesn't compare when pulling trailers. I can't offer an opinion on a 6.2 with the variable cam phasing. I'm sorry to see the 8.1 go, especially with how the newer diesel are less mod friendly and super complicated.
__________________
Paul III
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-19-2009, 04:36 AM
WILMASBOYL78's Avatar
WILMASBOYL78 WILMASBOYL78 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: new york
Posts: 8,386
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2,240 Times in 594 Posts
Default Re: No more Big Blocks....R.I.P.

[ QUOTE ]
I'm certain the Federal Government has a hand in this.. They don't want these motors around anymore... Very Sad

Rich

[/ QUOTE ]

Those big blocks are bad for the environment...everyone knows that. The polar ice pack has gotten smaller every year since they were introduced. Hopefully the ice will now return...at least a few cubes for my drink
__________________
02 Berger 380hp #95
Lots of L78 Novas
Join National Nostalgic Nova!
70 Orange Cooler
69 Camaro
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-19-2009, 07:05 AM
Jim69Z Jim69Z is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Amherst,Tonawanda,NY
Posts: 91
Thanks: 41
Thanked 18 Times in 10 Posts
Default Re: No more Big Blocks....R.I.P.

Here is a video from our local station today
http://www2.wivb.com/dpp/news/busine...e-off-the-line
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.