Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
My brother and I owned that car. We bought it in Utah as a stripped rust bucket and totaly restored it. We sold it at the Barret Jackson auction in Jan 07. The guy that won the auction sold it in Vegas this last October.
Keith [ QUOTE ] This one sold for $110K at Barrett-Jackson this year. ![]() 1967 Camaro with Fisher body #001. First L.A. produced deluxe interior coupe. VIN #16, lowest known surviving VIN number. Built August 1966, scheduled assembly code of "P001", 327cid/275hp L30, RPO Z23 - special interior group, RPO Z21 - style trim group. [/ QUOTE ] |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
00001 vin with 09B build date ? my 00068 vin '67 has a 08A build date. Seems odd. Frank.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would not put too much trust in the body date versus vin...especially this early on in production...I have the only 07C 67 Z28 known that is 243 VINs from the last Norwood Camaro, but there is a 67 Z within 100 VIN's of the last Norwood Camaro that is a 07B car...???
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
09B is actually OK for the early "Pilot" cars that have very very low VINs. Have no idea why but there are several documented pilot cars that have low numbers but the tags are dated 09B with a body number that is far to low for an 09B. For the cars that are known the body number used here along with the date lines up very well. Regular production cars had normal dated tags and what not. Is this car a "Pilot" car? Hard to say for sure with the current information I have but does look pretty good so far.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am currently trying to locate the owner of the Norwood car anyone have a line on who has it? [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/beers.gif[/img]
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|