![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Originally posted by: 66 L78 ragtop Is this your personal philosophy or do you have objective data and/or sound reasoning that would lead the readers of your post to draw your same conclusion? [/ QUOTE ] I saw it in a dream! ![]() And we know of cars out there with YS#'s that are known to be uncoverted... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Originally posted by: 66 L78 ragtop Is this your personal philosophy or do you have objective data and/or sound reasoning that would lead the readers of your post to draw your same conclusion? [/ QUOTE ] I saw it in a dream! ![]() And we know of cars out there with YS#'s that are known to be uncoverted... [/ QUOTE ] Can you elaborate as to how you concluded that said YS numbered cars were unconverted? Do you have an example of a one owner, survivor car with bullet proof documentation indicating a YS# and an engine other than a 427? If not, how can you draw a verifiable and plausible conclusion that some YS numbered cars were unconverted? If a converted car wan't an indication for a YS# assignmnet, then what was the indication for assigning a YS number to a car? I'm not trying to bust your chops, just fishing for a non-speculative, non-circumstantial answer...I don't think there is one and therefore do not think that a YS numbered car can reasonably and justifiably be reduced to an unconverted car. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Originally posted by: 66 L78 ragtop Is this your personal philosophy or do you have objective data and/or sound reasoning that would lead the readers of your post to draw your same conclusion? [/ QUOTE ] I saw it in a dream! ![]() And we know of cars out there with YS#'s that are known to be uncoverted... [/ QUOTE ] Can you elaborate as to how you concluded that said YS numbered cars were unconverted? Do you have an example of a one owner, survivor car with bullet proof documentation indicating a YS# and an engine other that a 427? If not, how can you draw a verifiable and plausible conclusion that some YS numbered cars were unconverted? If a converted car wan't an indication for a YS# assignmnet, then what was the indication for assigning a YS number to a car? I'm not trying to bust your chops, just fishing for a non-speculative, non-circumstantial answer...I don't think there is one and therefore do not think that a YS numbered car can reasonably and justifiably be reduced to an unconverted car. [/ QUOTE ] Off the top of my head I can think of 2 Novas, one of which still has the original Yenko Sportscars, Inc. file (YS# 9769 I believe)... |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What did the Black and Red 67 Yenko sell for last year?
__________________
~JAG~ NCRS#65120 68 GTO HO 4 spd Alpine Blue /Parchment 2 owner car #21783 71 Corvette LT1 45k miles Orig paint - Brandshatch Green - National Top Flight - last known 71 LT1 built. 71 Corvette LT1 42k miles Original paint - Black - black leather - only black LT1 known to exist. NUMEROUS Lemans blue Camaros, Monza Red and Daytona Yellow Corvettes & a Chevelle or two... Survivors, restored cars, & other photos https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/myphotos |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All Yenko deuces had a YS#. None were converted. All were COPOs. None were 427s.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I guess it all depends on your definition of conversion because I think of all the 70 copo nova's arriving at yenko unconverted and the conversion put on wheels, stripes, tach, etc. which made it a yenko deuce. The conversion in 70 made it a yenko deuce as opposed to Petes copo nova. On 69 camaro's there was the same sticker/emblem treatment as 70, no engine change. 67 and 68 camaro's and 69 nova's received 427 engine in the conversion to a yenko supercar with emblems, etc. my two cent opinion on definition..
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I guess it all depends on your definition of conversion because I think of all the 70 copo nova's arriving at yenko unconverted and the conversion put on wheels, stripes, tach, etc. which made it a yenko deuce. The conversion in 70 made it a yenko deuce as opposed to Petes copo nova. On 69 camaro's there was the same sticker/emblem treatment as 70, no engine change. 67 and 68 camaro's and 69 nova's received 427 engine in the conversion to a yenko supercar with emblems, etc. my two cent opinion on definition.. [/ QUOTE ] Bill is nicely summarizing the previous perspectives, the YS# is simply a tracking device - and was/can be used to track different things in different years. I would not hang my hat on a YS# as anything other than a YS#!
__________________
Marlin 70 Yenko Nova-350/360, 4speed M21, 4.10 Posi (Daddy's Ride) 69 SS Nova-396/375hp, 4speed M20, 3.55 Posi (Benjamin's Ride) 67 RS Camaro-327/250hp, 2speed Glide, & 3.08 Open (Danny's Ride) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think all dealerships, then and now, used such a system of assigning stock numbers to their inventory. My 2010 had such a number.
There is no doubt that not all cars receiving a YS # got converted.
__________________
Tom Clary |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|