Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-28-2009, 06:06 AM
Pat O'Connell Pat O'Connell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 96
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71

Excellent points, Tim..I'd question the seller as to why the engine was pulled for a rebuild...From the description, it didn't need much once it was torn down.
__________________
Pat O'Connell

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-28-2009, 07:31 AM
LS6 RAT LS6 RAT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Nevada City, California
Posts: 275
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71


The engine was pulled by the original owner and a small block stuck into it. This original engine was mounted on an engine stand in the garage of the owner when he died and in need of a repair from a broken piston ring. The widow sold the car to a classic car dealer and stated that this engine was the original engine from the car.
The car is and has all the original unique pieces for a L71 optioned car. The engine pad has original broach marks. I am not questioning the authenticity of the stamping, I am stating that this car with this stamping anomaly and the fact that there is no factory paperwork to verify its options, makes this car somewhat suspicious to collectors with that messed up stamping and no paperwork. This wouldn't be my first choice for an investment quality Corvette.
__________________
2 1971 LS-6 Corvette coupes (Duntov's last stand)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-28-2009, 02:17 PM
bergy's Avatar
bergy bergy is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pennsylvania, Florida
Posts: 2,811
Thanks: 887
Thanked 1,451 Times in 396 Posts
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71

Great discussion and observations guys. I was a GMI student sponsored by Chevrolet Tonawanda back in the day. Like most co-op students, I occassionally got the crap jobs (like stamping parts that had missing/wrong digits). I'm not saying that the "T" in question is or isn't ligit, but it wouldn't surprise me. Our job was simply to obliterate the old digit and add a new one - "pretty" wasn't in our vocabulary! I usually used an "X" stamp or grinder (on "as cast" surfaces) to get rid of the incorrect digit. It was really up to the inspection department to determine the method - it just had to be correctly, permanently marked - that's all. I hate that this car has that goofed up "T", but who knew that our work as a bunch of 18 year olds would someday be placed under a microscope?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-28-2009, 06:46 PM
al8apex al8apex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 1,993
Thanks: 25
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71

I, too, went to GMI in the early 70's

I worked at Pontiac in Pontiac MI. The sh** that went on back then was truly unbelievable, at least for this 18 year olds eyes

One of my duties was to crawl around in the rafters of the engine plant and count the number of blocks that had fallen off the conveyor system ... in black sand / dust environment, probably the equivalent of being in a coal mine ... so the "myth" that block HAD to be cast within a certain time period is only that, a myth. They would send up a newbie GMI student every year to get them counted and pulled down ...

I was never involved with the stamping process, but here is a Muncie we had last year that obviously had problems with the stamp, they finally gave up and stamped it 90 degrees from the "normal" area to the top of the case ...

http://www.camaros.net/forums/showthread.php?t=136529






__________________
Jim R
Scottsdale, AZ

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-28-2009, 07:07 PM
1969l78 1969l78 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,901
Thanks: 36
Thanked 32 Times in 14 Posts
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71

I would say they had a problem with that stamping. I am sure there where some weird things to happen back in the day.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-28-2009, 09:03 PM
HiHorse HiHorse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ontario
Posts: 276
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71

Need to see the car in person.....no block casting date mentioned, no picture of 3/4" plug or 4 bolt caps....does have proper tach and oil gauge.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-02-2009, 03:59 PM
Wardy Wardy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71

[ QUOTE ]
The car... has all the original unique pieces for a L71 optioned car.

[/ QUOTE ]
I would take Warren's assessment to the bank
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-02-2009, 05:13 PM
jeff-san jeff-san is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ca.
Posts: 347
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71

last time I looked the car got bid up over 40k and looked like it was going to sell. I hope the new owner is prepared for what he's going to receive.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-02-2009, 11:21 PM
1969z280 1969z280 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Columbia City, Indiana
Posts: 955
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71

Jeff:

Thanks for the "heads-up" on the Corvette. If I had not spoken with you, I would have gotten sucked into the hole with the others. Ed
__________________
... some old Chevrolets and Pontiacs.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-03-2009, 12:33 AM
TimG TimG is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,494
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2,466 Times in 968 Posts
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71

I'm still wondering if the issue with the car is the stamp or if there is another issue?
I wouldn't completly rule that stamp out as not being a factory issued piece. It would certainly require explaining for judging or resale, though.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.