![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think evac-u-pan would be ok, and shouldn't cause any problems, unless you have to pass a smog test every year. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/dunno.gif[/img]
with a standard PCV, the excess gases are sucked back into the intake, and re-burnt, with evac-u-pan, the gases are sucked right into the exhaust, where they might not be completely burt before being exhausted. I had the same setup on a 340 Duster I had some yrs back. I didn't have any problems, but afetr I sold the car, the guy I sold it to had to pass a smog test, and it failed. I never did hear if he ever got it to pass, or what he had to do to get it to pass. I simple PCV would be alot easier, and cheaper.
__________________
Dennis 69 Nova 355, M-21, 3.90 12 bolt 68 Chevelle SS 396 4 sp |
|
|