stolen camaro found out of state

[69LM1]

So.... The original owner should screw the second victim to get back as much investment as he can?

I understand quarters and paint, but the engine/rims/transmission that the second victim put in the car do not belong to the first victim in any way (ethically, not legally).

I am sure there is plenty of things they both did wrong (and hell, I've done it myself!) but in the end the primary victim did not ask to be stolen from nor did the second victim know the car was hot before he started on it. They both could have made better decisions, but the only one that deserves scorn is the thief.

I agree, if they get lawyers involved it will be a lose/lose.


Rich