![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Camshaft, for one thing... [/ QUOTE ] That is it, there is no other advantage, if in fact it is an advantage. The bigger cam would be required to support the higher revs a 302 would need to attain to produce the power required (vs. the 350.) The lt-1 has screw in studs and guideplates ,smaller cam, and more cubes. The reason the factory rated the 302 at a lower RPM was to keep the advertised HP number down. You will note the Boss 302 is also rated at 290hp. Its a simple matter of deciding what advertised HP level needs to be, and pick the RPM point at which that happens and use it. I do not believe the 302 has any "special" advantage over any other similarly equipped small block,other than perhaps a better rod stroke ratio, and had the engineers at GM been able to use a 327 or a 350 for that matter, I'm sure they would have. The size choice was only to keep within the SCCA 5.0L limit at the time. The LT-1 has it over the 302 owing to the cubic inch difference, and all if not more performance pieces. The LT-1 was unfortunately saddled with a crappy retarded ignition from stock, and a leaner than optimal carb jetting, but a "super tuned" LT-1 is an engine to be reckoned with, and with a much better cam in any of the aftermarket grinds,(even keeping conservative) will show a pretty impressive HP and Torque.
__________________
2012 ZL1 black M6 1968 L36 4 spd Biscayne 1957 270 hp Corvette |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|