![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
To me it always seemed like the Muncie shifters have about 2 mile long throws compared to the Hurst...I had a 69 Chevelle with a factory Muncie and it actually shifted pretty decent...not super, but decent. (It did bind up every once in awhile, requiring me to crawl under the car and yank on the rods with my hands or bang on them with a wrench to free them up.) For what it's worth, the factory Hurst in my Deuce is no picture of precision either.
__________________
Joe Barr |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
For an approximation of the "feel" of a Muncie shifter place a tire iron in a pail of large rocks. [/ QUOTE ] ![]() ![]() ![]() Unfortunately, that's an extremely accurate description. I had a '68 Chevelle with the Muncie shifter. Everything said in the previous three postings is true. The 1-2 and 3-4 shifts weren't too bad but the 2-3 shift you could time with a calendar. I would use the factory shifters for accuracy, but NOT for function or reliability!
__________________
Don't mistake education for intelligence. I worked with educated people. I socialize with intelligent people. |
![]() |
|
|