Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. | 
	
		
			
  | 
	|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search | 
 
 | 
	
	
| 
		 | 
	Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
| 
		 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I am having some trouble with my new clutch install. My install is an  Muncie M21, '621' bellhousing and 11" clutch behind a 350 sbc. The fork I have for this is the   ( 10.4 "in length). when installed it will not center the throwout bearing on the clutch diaphram fingers. After researching this problem I was advised that Chevy used two forks in '69 based on the clutch size/bellhousing used. Theey are: # 3892632 and # 14066235;  Per the information I received, clutch fork # 14066235 (which measures 11" in length} was used with the '621' bellhousing and 11" clutch when installed on the higher horsepower 350s Camaros { like a 350/300 hp in an SS}. The # 3892632 fork was installed on  other sbcs and ironically the 1969 Z28 as well.  If anyone has can shed some clarity on this subject it would be much appreciated. Regards
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Hmm, it doesn't sound like the 14066235 (73-81) fork will work without modification based on this post: https://www.camaros.net/threads/clut...rewall.200119/ 
		
		
		
			I went down and looked at my 621 bellhousing and fork destined for my 69 SS350 and measured the fork (no numbers on it   ) and it measures 10 1/8".  When looking down the center it does look aligned, but I hope it is the correct one! I bought it many decades ago!
		
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
			69 SS 350 convertible (in peices) 69 327 convertible (driver) Last edited by KevinW; 11-03-2021 at 02:16 AM.  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Thanks, did you fully seat the fork on the ball stud for this picture?
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Yes, the Z28 did get the 403 bell for 10.5 clutch and shorter fork. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			Are you keeping the bearing centered on the fork ends, or pushing all the way back ? It needs to be balanced on the ends and the spring holds it there until the trans is installed and it rides on the input collar. 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Mitch 1970 Chevelle SS 1966 Chevelle SS 1967 Camaro ss/rs 1938 Business coupe, street rod 2000 FXSTS, original owner, 13k miles  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Yes it is.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	69 SS 350 convertible (in peices) 69 327 convertible (driver)  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			3892632 is the clutch fork for both 11" and 10.25" clutches 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			All the GM parts books verify this. There are not 2 different forks. Both bellhousings, the 403 and 621 took the same fork. 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	1969 Camaro RS/SS Azure Turquoise 1969 Camaro Z/28 Azure Turquoise 1984 Camaro z/28 L69 HO 5 speed 1984 Camaro z/28 zz4 conversion 1987 Monte Carlo SS original owner  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#7  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Was in the parts biz back in the day. Recall a few guys having problems with a release fork rubbing on the tunnel.  
		
		
		
		
		
		
			There was another part number for passenger car applications, 3860005. 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Learning more and more about less and less...  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#8  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Thanks for the clarity fellows. Per your post and the pictures above I re-checked mine and it fits just as in the posted pics. I simply had it seated too deeply in the fork opening, not riding on the end of the fingers. My learning experience. Regards
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| The Following User Says Thank You to 66cayne For This Useful Post: | ||
 Too Many Projects (11-03-2021)  | ||
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |