|   Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. | 
| 
 | |||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search | 
|   | 
|  | Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  1969 Impala 427-335HP COPO Question ?   2-23-2011 
			
			Question I found a 1969 Impala 2 Door 427-335HP Turbo-Jet Car is loaded with paper work & all #'s Matching. But I am unclear how to determine how to find out if the car is a real COPO. Car does have a Broadcast sheet not perfect shape but I think it is legible. Also has a Protecto plate. Window sticker may be a reproduction but has LS1AA for engine code. Is there a spot where I can look to tell if it is a COPO | 
| 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  Re: 1969 Impala 427-335HP COPO Question ?   2-23-2011 
			
			What makes you think it might be a COPO? I have owned several 69 SS427's and 69 Impala 427's, none were COPOs. If it is a COPO it would likely mean it was a fleet car. Fred Gibb ordered several 69 Impala 427 cars for the AHRA. 
				__________________ Rick Nelson Musclecar Restoration and Design, Inc (retired) www.musclecarrestorationanddesign.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62r-6vgk2_8 specialized in (only real) LS6 Chevelle restorations | 
| 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Re: 1969 Impala 427-335HP COPO Question ?   2-23-2011 
			
			No real reason why I think it is a COPO. I just know they did make them & just trying to find out if there was a special code or something that would stand out to identify it one way or the other. I just don't want pass on the deal to buy the car if it was a COPO. Thanks | 
| 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Re: 1969 Impala 427-335HP COPO Question ?   2-23-2011 
			
			What type of COPO are you referring to? The engine was an RPO, other than being a cool option, there is nothing special(COPO) about it. Jason | 
| 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Re: 1969 Impala 427-335HP COPO Question ?   2-23-2011 
			
			There are alot of 335 hp cars built...No big deal here. 
				__________________ 1970 GTO JUDGE RAM IV 23,000 miles 1969 GTO convert RAM AIR 4spd 1964 GTO convert survivor | 
| 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Re: 1969 Impala 427-335HP COPO Question ?   2-23-2011 
			
			Thank you very much to everyone for the info help. I guess it is still a cool 427 Impala but not a rare COPO. | 
| 
			 
			#7  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  Re: 1969 Impala 427-335HP COPO Question ?   2-23-2011 
			
			<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Old Time Classics</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Thank you very much to everyone for the info help. I guess it is still a cool 427 Impala but not a rare COPO. </div></div> Correct. Phil Woj | 
| 
			 
			#8  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Re: 1969 Impala 427-335HP COPO Question ?   2-23-2011 
			
			<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Old Time Classics</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Thank you very much to everyone for the info help. I guess it is still a cool 427 Impala but not a rare COPO. </div></div> MOST of the "rare" COPO's discussed here are of the performance variety, ie 427-425 hp in a Camaro or a Chevelle not a low horse 427 in an Impala While cool, they are not really a "performance" car As stated, nearly ANY car could have a "COPO" attached to it, fleet order, odd color, etc. Even 4 doors could be a "COPO" [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/smile.gif[/img] 
				__________________ Jim R Scottsdale, AZ   | 
| 
			 
			#9  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  Re: 1969 Impala 427-335HP COPO Question ?   2-23-2011 
			
			Jim is right and since the 427/425 is still an available RPO option, it would not be considered a COPO except one of the other above reasons. However, none of those would really add any value to the car over and above what it already is. | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 |