Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. | 
	
| 
		 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			From an October 15, 69 casting #854 396, what car do you think this came from?  What would be the 7th position in the vin looks like a number 8 rather than a letter.   
		
		
		
			If it is supposed to be a B that could be a Baltimore November Chevelle based on the sequence. Thoughts? Last edited by SMS; 11-11-2020 at 05:23 PM.  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 No, but thanks. I knew a CTW could be from a Nova, Camaro or Chevelle. Its also a 2 bolt block, so not a 375. (sorry!)  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			That’s a weird partial vin after CTW. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			1=Chevrolet 0= 1970 8=? 120589 sequential vin. Maybe it’s a B ? Buddy 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	69 camaro Z-28 burnished brown X-77 bought 1978 70 camaro Z28 forest green M40 black vinyl roof PROJECT 99 camaro SS Hugger Orange 6speed no t-tops 1 of 54 11 cts-v black diamond edition wagon 556hp GONE 15 camaro Z/28 white AC brand new  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I'm guessing a Baltimore built Chevelle. I've seen the 8 used in place of the "B" on rare occasions.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	70 Chevelle Vert L34 M21 28-A 791 70 Chevelle Cpe LS6 M40 14-14 756 70 Chevelle Cpe L?? M?? 926-99616 755 69 Chevelle Cpe L78 M21 71-B 756 70 Chevelle Cpe L34 M20 48-48 796  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I have seen many incorrect stampings from Baltimore such as 100 and 188 and the obvious and correct 10B but never a 108. However, based on the others it is very possible they did that as well and it matches the timeline when the other fubars were made. Definitely a Chevelle.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Rick Nelson Musclecar Restoration and Design, Inc (retired) www.musclecarrestorationanddesign.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62r-6vgk2_8 specialized in (only real) LS6 Chevelle restorations  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#7  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Thanks everybody.  I'll try to get a better image of the sequence numbers and get this Orphan up for adoption.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#8  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Definitely a Baltimore Chevelle engine.  That is one of the many Baltimore anomalies  that showed up for 70 . There are many.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| The Following User Says Thank You to Ls6 Ragtop For This Useful Post: | ||
 enio45 (11-15-2020)  | ||
![]()  | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  |