Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
04-25-2008, 11:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
1967 Corvette 427ci 400hp A/C Convertible
__________________
Click to visit the Nickey Performance Facebook--> 
|
|
#2
04-26-2008, 06:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1967 Corvette 427ci 400hp A/C Convertible
------The Nabors restored a twin to this car years ago. Guy named Gary Coogan from here in Detroit area owned it then. Might this be the same car??? It was a nice one.........Bill S
|
|
#4
04-27-2008, 09:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1967 Corvette 427ci 400hp A/C Convertible
It is also our opinion that the block was restamped.
__________________
Click to visit the Nickey Performance Facebook-->
|
|
#5
04-27-2008, 10:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1967 Corvette 427ci 400hp A/C Convertible
------Probably wasnt Garys then as he was and is the 67 big-block stampings judge...........Bill S
|
|
#6
04-27-2008, 10:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1967 Corvette 427ci 400hp A/C Convertible
[ QUOTE ]
It is also our opinion that the block was restamped. [/ QUOTE ] Not to be a trouble maker here but why doesn't the Ebay description say this? James
__________________
1968 Beaumont SD396
|
|
#7
04-28-2008, 02:48 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1967 Corvette 427ci 400hp A/C Convertible
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] It is also our opinion that the block was restamped. [/ QUOTE ] Not to be a trouble maker here but why doesn't the Ebay description say this? James [/ QUOTE ] when you translate the cross between PeeBait lingo and Corvetteese; "Most Components are Numbers Matching and Date Coded" ...it does say restamp. the seller is "up-front" when asked a question about numbers matching... Q: Please excuse a very dumb question, but I'm new to the hobby and still trying to figure out this "matching numbers" thing. If the pad stamping shows Sept 28th how can the block casting date be january '66?? Thanx for any help. Apr-25-08 A: I don't think it is a dumb question. I have been informed that "I" in the casting date designates September. So that Should be September 23 1966. That is 5 days prior to the pad stamp of the 28th of September. woops...sadly an opportunity to declare "restamped correctly" was just missed
|
Hybrid Mode
