Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
04-09-2005, 12:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Yenko Turbo Z article
  
__________________
IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM !!! 
|
|
#3
04-10-2005, 08:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Yenko Turbo Z article
Interesting to note that the California equipped Z28s only had the 305 smog engines available and that the ETs quoted in the magazine were for a 305 equipped car.
The 350 Z28s tested by TI, Were running almost a full second quicker. The low compression 350s were a good match for a turbo charger, as long as the water injection was working to minimize the detonation at full boost.
__________________
Click to visit the Nickey Performance Facebook--> 
|
|
#4
04-10-2005, 09:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Yenko Turbo Z article
So according to the article the Yenko 350 would be legal for California--I wonder if a California dealer could have ordered a 350 Z for sale if it was to be converted to Yenko specs ?......
|
|
|
|
article Jeff --does this Member still own his---
Hybrid Mode
