![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yenko stripes belong on Yenko cars... thats it
![]() http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...;category=6172
__________________
https://t.me/pump_upp |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, do you consider that a "Yenko Stripe"? It has nothing about Yenko stripes mentioned in the auction. . . even though we all know they are Yenko stripes with "Nova SS" on the rear quarters, and "350" on the hood. I think everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but personally, I don't think that should be considered a "Yenko" stripe. . . he's not fooling anybody. I actually think it looks decent. It's something different, rather than all the clones out there. That's why I went with Motion stripes on my car. Every other camaro you see out there, there's stripes on the hood, header panel, and decklid; It's not everyday you see a Motion stripe scheme.
__________________
John "Hutch" Skierka |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually that looks pretty cool. I'm guessing years ago some former owner saw a Yenko, thought it looked cool and copied the stripes. At least he had the decency to change the lettering so not to misrepresent the car as something it isn't.
I honestly don't see a problem with that. ![]()
__________________
Jeff ![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's exactly how I feel!
__________________
John "Hutch" Skierka |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To tell the truth I like the side and rear stripes. Kind of what the Camaros might have received had the rear stripes not became a deleted option.
As for the hood nah thats should be a Yenko ONLY thing
__________________
IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM !!! |
![]() |
|
|