![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
could anyone help me with a 69 camaro early vin with no xcodes but complete except motor, can give vin and descriptions of components, thanks matt
![]() ![]()
__________________
67 Rs modified stormer z28 482cu in.yenko camaro 67 327 camaro 69 SS 396 camaro |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
5 leaf multis orig, 12 bolt, 4spd, daytona yellow, black interior, plain jane, no console, no trim, 6000 yellow line /7000 red line tach orig, car has spoiler with springs that take your head off when you open trunk, disk brake front end, 555xxx vin, about a half hour away from scuncio dealer...
__________________
67 Rs modified stormer z28 482cu in.yenko camaro 67 327 camaro 69 SS 396 camaro |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How many fuel lines running from the tank up to the engine? Small block or big block heater core? Dual exhaust plate on the driver's side rear frame rail?
__________________
69 Z28 JL8, #'s match - being restored |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
exhaust plate is there, heater delete!! I didn't check the fuel lines, ahd a bitc# of a time climbing under it w/ 4 flats, cars' interior is orig done to rug
__________________
67 Rs modified stormer z28 482cu in.yenko camaro 67 327 camaro 69 SS 396 camaro |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Has to be Canadian for factory heater delete in 1969 not lower 48...BKH
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
well we're in ma so we're close, guy did say he bought it in new hampshire, after we asked where he got it, about 20 yrS AGO, never got around to restoring it.
![]()
__________________
67 Rs modified stormer z28 482cu in.yenko camaro 67 327 camaro 69 SS 396 camaro |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Has to be Canadian for factory heater delete in 1969 not lower 48...BKH [/ QUOTE ] Sounds like you should run the vin past GM of Canada, and if Brian is correct, they should be able to document it. Peter |
![]() |
|
|