Another DZ 302

[198plus]

My friend has a 1969 DZ 302 Camaro for sell, that I was looking at.... The stamping on the pad looks wrong to me, any thoughts on this would be appreciated.

V0106DZ on the pad
D18 build date on motor





Pic of tag

[Salvatore]

You can also ask The CRG if you didn't already.

[Mr.Nickey Nova]

According to Jerry MacNeish in his 69 Camaro book shows that vin number being built in Oct.of 68,which the vin should be stamped on the pad and not down by the oil filter like the pic you took.What cast number is showing on the block??Is it a 386 or a 618 block??I'm thinking restamp,maybe others will chime in..

[198plus]

It's 3970010 block.

[Salvatore]

010 blocks were not available in the early 69 cars I believe.

[Mr.Nickey Nova]

010 blocks were used from April-November of 69. Restamp....

[198plus]

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Mr.Nickey Nova</div><div class="ubbcode-body">010 blocks were used from April-November of 69. Restamp.... </div></div>

Thanks for your help. Also what your thought's on this engine....

https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/ubbt...opics/492017/1

[Kurt S]

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 198plus</div><div class="ubbcode-body">My friend has a 1969 DZ 302 Camaro for sell, that I was looking at.... The stamping on the pad looks wrong to me, any thoughts on this would be appreciated.

V0106DZ on the pad
D18 build date on motor
</div></div>
Pad is clearly a restamp. VIN and tag don't match too.
That car has been around - it was for sale last year.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Thanks for your help. Also what your thought's on this engine....</div></div>
That's already been answered.....