Go Back   The Supercar Registry > Classified Section > Ebay & other seen ads section

Please note


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-01-2022, 03:22 PM
Lynn Lynn is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 7,725
Thanks: 87
Thanked 3,539 Times in 1,495 Posts
Default Red Red Z/28 on BAT

https://bringatrailer.com/listing/19...amaro-z-28-73/

Interesting history.

Mark Canning called it out as having a fake tag back in 2007. Had an 05D tag that did not line up with the vin.

https://www.camaros.net/threads/69-jl8-crossram.121098/

Funny, after Mark says it should probably be an 04L tag, it shows up at BJ auction with an 04L tag.
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lynn For This Useful Post:
YenkoYS-199Stinger (03-01-2022)
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 03-01-2022, 03:39 PM
Mr70's Avatar
Mr70 Mr70 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 20,888
Thanks: 70
Thanked 3,477 Times in 1,413 Posts
Default

Is anyone on here familiar with the seller?
PM me if so,thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-01-2022, 04:53 PM
Kurt S Kurt S is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 3,079
Thanks: 2
Thanked 768 Times in 361 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn View Post
https://bringatrailer.com/listing/19...amaro-z-28-73/
Funny, after Mark says it should probably be an 04L tag, it shows up at BJ auction with an 04L tag.
Which is why I never say what the build date should be.....

124379N637272
__________________
Kurt S - CRG
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-01-2022, 05:07 PM
Lynn Lynn is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 7,725
Thanks: 87
Thanked 3,539 Times in 1,495 Posts
Default

Is the current tag also a fake?

Thought crossed my mind that maybe after it was called out, that someone put the original back on. Not likely I know.

I have to say, after about 2005, the TT.com tags are a lot better than the early ones. That's what we get for making all the mistakes public.
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-01-2022, 08:02 PM
jdv69z's Avatar
jdv69z jdv69z is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 133
Thanks: 0
Thanked 34 Times in 22 Posts
Default

Wouldn't an original red Z have black Stripes?
__________________
Jimmy V.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-02-2022, 01:37 AM
MYSTERYCHEVELLE MYSTERYCHEVELLE is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Jeffersonville, PA
Posts: 1,106
Thanks: 263
Thanked 406 Times in 194 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn View Post
Is the current tag also a fake?

Thought crossed my mind that maybe after it was called out, that someone put the original back on. Not likely I know.

I have to say, after about 2005, the TT.com tags are a lot better than the early ones. That's what we get for making all the mistakes public.
Exactly!! One of the main reasons I don’t post deck stamps or either. Someone is always quietly learning how to make a better fake when you provide a blueprint.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-02-2022, 02:29 AM
RSSSfan RSSSfan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 603
Thanks: 1
Thanked 175 Times in 118 Posts
Default

Seller got a little salty that the car didn't bring $100k+ like some of the Z's on BAT have brought. Someone called out the trim tag issue early in the string of comments, not sure if that affected the results or not. Seller claims he is going to twin-turbo LS the car. Might as well - it could be a real Z, or it could just as easily have been an X11 or X44 car that was made into one. No way to tell for sure now.

I just shake my head about some of the regulars on that site whining about people asking about the provenance of cars that are advertised as real-deal rare, highly desirable collectibles with original components. If you own an original Rembrandt and you see someone hawking fakes, aren't you going to get a little pizzed that the value of your investment is being diluted?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-01-2022, 08:00 PM
Jonesy's Avatar
Jonesy Jonesy is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Duluth, Minnesota
Posts: 3,128
Thanks: 333
Thanked 786 Times in 492 Posts
Default

The 4L tag looks legit to me. It seems some previous owner ? put a repop tag from 05D on it to help sell the theory of original engine. Engine is stamped V0516DZ
__________________
1969 Camaro RS/SS Azure Turquoise
1969 Camaro Z/28 Azure Turquoise
1984 Camaro z/28 L69 HO 5 speed
1984 Camaro z/28 zz4 conversion
1987 Monte Carlo SS original owner
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-01-2022, 08:11 PM
CanCOPO CanCOPO is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 233
Thanks: 627
Thanked 173 Times in 50 Posts
Default

Yes. Garnet red had black stripes. Burgundy had white
__________________
1969 Hugger Orange RS COPO (Sold)
1969 Garnet Red Z28
1969 Super Bee (Sold)
1965 Pontiac Lemans
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-01-2022, 11:08 PM
Danzo Danzo is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 441
Thanks: 3
Thanked 118 Times in 67 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CanCOPO View Post
Yes. Garnet red had black stripes. Burgundy had white
Unless a particular car had a white vinyl or convertible top then the stripes would be white.
Doc
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.