Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-25-2009, 06:34 PM
jeff-san jeff-san is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ca.
Posts: 347
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default looks are deceiving L-71

if anyone is getting sucked in by this car, I can speak from first hand knowledge that things look better in pictures. Dont waste your time JMO. you can contact me if you have any questions. I dont want anyone to make a quick decision and get burned.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Chevrolet...1QQcmdZViewItem
Reply With Quote
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 02-25-2009, 06:43 PM
Fast67VelleN2O's Avatar
Fast67VelleN2O Fast67VelleN2O is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Mullica Hill, NJ
Posts: 4,106
Thanks: 7
Thanked 186 Times in 93 Posts
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71

Doesn't look like a bad car... Like the color combo!
__________________
Day 2 is Life.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-25-2009, 07:05 PM
JJEH's Avatar
JJEH JJEH is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tornado Alley, OK
Posts: 904
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71

[ QUOTE ]
Doesn't look like a bad car... Like the color combo!

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, like the Combo too

Looks like a clean Car...
__________________
Jorge

www.estrada-armory.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-25-2009, 10:58 PM
Wardy Wardy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71

I wonder which L-36 code was under the T? yeesh

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-26-2009, 12:33 AM
Mr. Chevy's Avatar
Mr. Chevy Mr. Chevy is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Northern Ohio
Posts: 4,616
Thanks: 286
Thanked 704 Times in 347 Posts
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71

Boy that engine pad stamp looks "funny" in the e-bay ad...

Rich
__________________
"This is Sheriff Buford T. Justice, I'm in pursuit of a black Trans Am, he is all mine so stay out of the way"
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-26-2009, 12:55 AM
Dave Rifkin Dave Rifkin is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Little Egg Harbor, NJ, USA
Posts: 2,208
Thanks: 13,724
Thanked 346 Times in 177 Posts
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71

[ QUOTE ]
I wonder which L-36 code was under the T? yeesh


[/ QUOTE ]

Looks like there was a "P" under there to me
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-26-2009, 01:33 AM
x  Baldwin  Motion's Avatar
x Baldwin Motion x  Baldwin  Motion is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: 41N 72 18.5W Sag Harbor NY
Posts: 6,640
Thanks: 217
Thanked 178 Times in 68 Posts
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71

Reserve has been met at $29,000.00 is it not worth that much???!!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-26-2009, 02:56 AM
HiHorse HiHorse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ontario
Posts: 276
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71

[ QUOTE ]
if anyone is getting sucked in by this car, I can speak from first hand knowledge that things look better in pictures. Dont waste your time JMO. you can contact me if you have any questions. I dont want anyone to make a quick decision and get burned.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Chevrolet...1QQcmdZViewItem

[/ QUOTE ] Can you share any details?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-26-2009, 10:13 AM
LS6 RAT LS6 RAT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Nevada City, California
Posts: 275
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: looks are deceiving L-71


Bill,
A friend of mine went to view this car last week. He was interested in it, so he asked me to take a look. At first glance it appears nice, like a survivor quality car. The undercarriage is quite rough and scares a lot people off. The stamp pad has several unusual anomalies, first the engine assembly uses two different zeros, not typical for big block, the digit eight is upside down,there is bounce back on both Tonawanda stamping and St. Louis stamping, and on top of that the bounce affects digits that are flanked on both sides of a digit that does NOT have bounce back, and the last suffix letter which is an R is obliterated by that ?. The same bounce back situation also is with the VIN derivative, bounce on two digits flanked on either side by one that doesn't. Two stampings at two different plants at different times by different people have the same anomalies?
I've seen factory goofs but the chances of this many on one stamping? The other problem is their is no factory paperwork to prove this option on the car, unfortunately. Even if substantiated as all real by the factory, you would have a darn difficult time convincing most collectors of this, especially when prices go back up to what they were early last year.
__________________
2 1971 LS-6 Corvette coupes (Duntov's last stand)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.