value

Stuart Adams · #1 01-04-2006, 04:41 AM

Any expert opinions on the value difference between a 1967 converted 427 vs non converted 396 Yenko camaro?

sYc · #2 01-04-2006, 04:45 AM

A very good question. Howie and I have discussed this at length. No non-converted cars have sold that we know of, so this should set the mark.

Having solid docs ought to help.

Stuart Adams · #3 01-04-2006, 04:59 AM

So until recently have all owners of these cars assumed they were all converted, and are some cars with 427 in them when they should have 396??

Second question, if you put a 427 in a non converted car, would it be frowned on by the experts?

**Salvatore** · #4 01-04-2006, 05:11 AM

And at this point...Who is the experts???

**MosportGreen66** · #5 01-04-2006, 05:42 AM

[ QUOTE ]
And at this point...Who is the experts???

[/ QUOTE ]

I shake my head with approval Sam!

Stuart Adams · #6 01-04-2006, 06:04 AM

Ok, forget the experts. How about a Yenko camaro that should have a 396 but has a 427, any big deal or not?

sYc · #7 01-04-2006, 06:10 AM

With nothing in the paperwork indicating a 427, I would say a big deal.

Stuart Adams · #8 01-04-2006, 06:27 AM

Thanks, do you think the value of a 396 car is less than a 427 car?

**Salvatore** · #9 01-04-2006, 06:27 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Ok, forget the experts. How about a Yenko camaro that should have a 396 but has a 427, any big deal or not?

[/ QUOTE ]Thats ok with me I will take it. If it is a real Yenko with a non issued 427 and "NO DOCS" like BBBenny would say...take it anyway. We can fabricate a great story!

Belair62 · #10 01-04-2006, 06:55 AM

Sisters uncles brothers nephew ?

Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars.