Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Technical & Restoration


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-09-2004, 01:07 AM
Jeff Murphy Jeff Murphy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: People's Republic of CT
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Which tranny is more correct for a resto?

Would you advocate using a correctly dated transmission with a Camaro VIN (but obviously not the correct VIN) or a correctly dated CT replacement transmission?
Possibly an interesting debate...

The assembly line transmission might be more correct for a showroom resto, even though it could never have come in the car. On the other hand, the CT transmission might actually have been available to the car, but is definitely Day 2 (or at least non showroom).

What do you think?
__________________
Jeff M.

ZL1 #49 (Dale, Waukesha WI) Super Stock restoration by SCW; 9561AA (Walters, Hebron OH) Super Stock motor by the Grump
Reply With Quote
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 03-09-2004, 01:38 AM
Salvatore Salvatore is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 9,908
Thanks: 3
Thanked 229 Times in 193 Posts
Default Re: Which tranny is more correct for a resto?

They would be both wrong, so take your pick. If you blew your trans in the old days, and GM didn't fix your original, you got a counter exchange. Believe me, many, many trans. were scrapped in those days. Pick the one with the best ratio. JMO. Sam
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-09-2004, 05:16 AM
NCGuy68 NCGuy68 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: N. Carolina, Wake Co.
Posts: 677
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Which tranny is more correct for a resto?

I agree with Sam.

The original trans should have the VIN suffex and build date stamped on it as I'am sure you know.

On the other hand, I'd love to have the remnants of the exploded Muncies I've seen over the years. No doubt I could piece together a couple of nice M22s'.
__________________
Craig S.
"I saw Elvis At 1000 Feet"
John Force.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-09-2004, 07:49 AM
Unreal Unreal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Chattanooga, TN, USA
Posts: 1,335
Thanks: 1
Thanked 77 Times in 48 Posts
Default Re: Which tranny is more correct for a resto?

In my opinion, the fact that a tranny was an assembly line part is of no particular value, as the vast majority of used parts were originally installed on the line. I think a CT would be more desirable as it "could" have been a warranty replacement. Of course, there's no proof that a CT was on a Camaro as it could have been installed on a number of Chevy models.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-09-2004, 08:15 PM
68SSCamaro 68SSCamaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 299
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Which tranny is more correct for a resto?

It depends on what you are going to do with the car. If you are going to show it, then you need to find out what the judges guidelines are. Unfortunately I don't think there is a written guideline for some cars like the NCRS has for the Corvette. Each event might have different rules.

If it's for personal satisfaction, then you can set your own rules and do what you want. I'm in the same situation and have decided to go with a correctly dated tranny. It's the closest I can get to what came in it from the factory. JMO.
__________________
Martin Foltz
68 Camaro SS-396
L35/M20, Corvette Bronze, black vinyl top
George Olsen Chevrolet San Francisco
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-09-2004, 08:24 PM
Mr70's Avatar
Mr70 Mr70 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 20,913
Thanks: 70
Thanked 3,522 Times in 1,427 Posts
Default Re: Which tranny is more correct for a resto?

Jeff
I'm Curious,are you referring to a TH400,or a Muncie?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-09-2004, 08:58 PM
Jeff Murphy Jeff Murphy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: People's Republic of CT
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Which tranny is more correct for a resto?

Muncie in this case.

I know that the original owner of my Red COPO blew up several transmissions through his racing ownership of the car. No surprise given that he somehow got an M20 delivered to him by GM. In a conversation with him he told me that the rear end on the car was bullet proof but he could never get the transmissions to stay together (both in stock L-72 form and especially after he added a tunnel ram, etc.) -- I would have thought he would have changed to an M22 over the counter but he didn't remember.

I ran across an old thread about counter exchange transmissions and got to wondering what would be more appropriate for a high end resto on a COPO that didn't have the original tranny...
__________________
Jeff M.

ZL1 #49 (Dale, Waukesha WI) Super Stock restoration by SCW; 9561AA (Walters, Hebron OH) Super Stock motor by the Grump
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.