Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I can't tell what's original here aside from the color combo, but not a bad looking driver-quality car with some obvious paint issues.
Link to 1974 Barracuda auction ![]()
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
If it sat any higher in the back,it would...
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Boy,bad stance sure ruins the whole look of the car!
__________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkDf7PPRzJ0 |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Totally agree, but easy to fix.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just add Lakewood traction bars and a Gabriel HiJacker sticker on the bumper for that retro 70's look.
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to RSSSfan For This Useful Post: | ||
markinnaples (11-01-2019) | ||
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
74 is kind of a "cut off" number for me. Just can't handle the big bumper cars.
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't really consider those to be "big bumper" cars. They still have all the styling cues of the earlier ones. Contrast this to what GM did with the Camaro in 74-77 with the aluminum battering ram bumpers. I had a 76 and T-boned a 66 Mustang that pulled out in front of me. Smashed his car in a foot deep, but it didn't even bust out the headlights or grille on my car.
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to RSSSfan For This Useful Post: | ||
Crush (11-01-2019) | ||
![]() |
|
|