Reproduction Tires

[napa68]

I am in the market to purchase some reproduction tires for a 65 Corvette I have. Has anyone had a bad experience with "new" reproduction tires. I do drive my cars but I am a purist about appearance.
Thanks,
Tim

[Chevy454]

[ QUOTE ]
Has anyone had a bad experience with "new" reproduction tires.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, they seem to wear out after only 500 burnouts...

[napa68]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Has anyone had a bad experience with "new" reproduction tires.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, they seem to wear out after only 500 burnouts...

[/ QUOTE ]


That should hold me over for a season!

[JohnZ]

[ QUOTE ]
I am in the market to purchase some reproduction tires for a 65 Corvette I have. Has anyone had a bad experience with "new" reproduction tires. I do drive my cars but I am a purist about appearance.
Thanks,
Tim

[/ QUOTE ]

You will NOT be happy with reproduction bias-ply tires if you enjoy driving your car; if you must have "correct" bias-ply tires, your best bet are the Goodyear-licensed Power Cushion 7.75-15's from Kelsey Tire.

Radials are FAR better driving tires; 205/75-15 is the standard replacement size and won't interfere with the fenders. 215/70-15's are a little wider, but you risk interference at full steering lock and suspension compression like at driveway entries. Midyears are VERY intolerant of "wide tires".

[P.J.]

Good one Rob

Ya i bought a set for my 70 chevelle and have had them on for about 5 years(cooker) and also bought a set of red lines for my 68 Camaro ss. I love them I really like the way they ride. Oh yes radials are a modern ride but i can get that ride from my other cars.
Only problem is like Rob said after 500 burnouts you neeed to replace them.
PJ

[olredalert]

------John,,,Nice to see you over here every once in awhile! After living with a set of Corky Cokers gold-line radials for several years now I could not ever recommend them. I would rather have bias-plys. His radials are such low performance tires that once they are on a performance type car they are just evil handlers. Another radial,,,,maybe, but not the Cokers......Bill S

[napa68]

A couple of others who's opinion I hold high, suggested the Goodyear tire over anything else. While Coker has the lions share of the market, it seems to me not to many are real happy after the fact. Thanks to all who replied!
Tim

[Chevy454]

Not sure about the earlier 'Vette bias tires, but I know we've driven a *LOT* of miles on Polyglass tires in our various Chevelles/Novas/Camaros, and they've been fine for me...granted, we're not talking late model ZO6 type handling, but the older suspensions weren't designed for radials anyway, so any gains from tire upgrades will be limited without performance suspension upgrades...and I couldn't get our Eagle GTs to 60' with our Polyglass tires anyway!

BTW, good to see ya around here John Z...

[ORIGLS6]

Seems to me it's just another case of wanting 'everything' in one package. (Kinda like the Avalanche; it tries to be everything, but does NONE of it well! )
Sure, the bias ply tires aren't radials and don't give the ride and handling characteristics of the newer generation tires. But face the facts folks; we love the OLD cars. We do everything possible to make the cars exactly as they were in 'the day',.......... then talk about better tires, etc.
I have radials (obviously) on my daily driver Silverado and YES, it rides and handles better than my Chevelle or Nova. But I have bias tires on both those cars and have no plans to change. If you like the ride of a new car, build a Pro Touring piece and enjoy it. The cars we all love had bias ply tires. Live with it.

[mockingbird812]

What Mr. Cumby said !!!!